Cobalt(I) Pincer Complexes: Four‐ Versus Five‐Coordination

Tilong Yang,Hok Tsun Chan,Wing Hei Marco Wong,Ka Lok Chan,Fu Kit Sheong,Zhenyang Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202200267
IF: 2.551
2022-01-01
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:It is a common practice to associate a d(8) electron configuration with square planar, 4-coordinated complexes. A 5-coordinated complex with a d(8) configuration, although following the 18-electron rule perfectly, is not as common as it might seem. On the other hand, a considerable number of 5-coordinated d(8) Co(I) complexes has been reported, and some of them serve as active intermediates in catalysis. Understanding the preference of 4- versus 5-coordination for d(8) complexes is therefore of practical concern in catalysis design. In this work, we have presented an exploration of the possible factors that govern the preference between the two. Based on DFT calculations, we have investigated the free energy change of ligand binding to several Co(I) pincer complexes and have revealed the role of sigma and pi interaction of ligands.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?