Abstract:In this paper we study the facility location problem in the online with recourse and dynamic algorithm models. In the online with recourse model, clients arrive one by one and our algorithm needs to maintain good solutions at all time steps with only a few changes to the previously made decisions (called recourse). We show that the classic local search technique can lead to a (1+√2+e)-competitive online algorithm for facility location with only O(log n/e log 1/e) amortized facility and client recourse, where n is the total number of clients arrived during the process. We then turn to the dynamic algorithm model for the problem, where the main goal is to design fast algorithms that maintain good solutions at all time steps. We show that the result for online facility location, combined with the randomized local search technique of Charikar and Guha [Charikar and Guha, 2005], leads to a (1+√2+e)-approximation dynamic algorithm with total update time of O(n²) in the incremental setting against adaptive adversaries. The approximation factor of our algorithm matches the best offline analysis of the classic local search algorithm. Finally, we study the fully dynamic model for facility location, where clients can both arrive and depart. Our main result is an O(1)-approximation algorithm in this model with O(|F|) preprocessing time and O(nlog³ D) total update time for the HST metric spaces, where |F| is the number of potential facility locations. Using the seminal results of Bartal [Bartal, 1996] and Fakcharoenphol, Rao and Talwar [Fakcharoenphol et al., 2003], which show that any arbitrary N-point metric space can be embedded into a distribution over HSTs such that the expected distortion is at most O(log N), we obtain an O(log |F|) approximation with preprocessing time of O(|F|²log |F|) and O(nlog³ D) total update time. The approximation guarantee holds in expectation for every time step of the algorithm, and the result holds in the oblivious adversary model.

On Facility Location Problem in the Local Differential Privacy Model

Facility Location Problem in Differential Privacy Model Revisited

Improved Lower Bound for Differentially Private Facility Location

On the Facility Location Problem in Online and Dynamic Models.

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

On robustness and local differential privacy

On Facility Location with General Lower Bounds

Efficiency in local differential privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Locally differentially private estimation of nonlinear functionals of discrete distributions

Learning with User-Level Local Differential Privacy

Metric-based local differential privacy for statistical applications

Protecting Locations with Differential Privacy under Temporal Correlations

Answering Spatial Density Queries Under Local Differential Privacy

The Power of Recourse: Better Algorithms for Facility Location in Online and Dynamic Models

FLDP: Flexible strategy for local differential privacy

(Local) Differential Privacy has NO Disparate Impact on Fairness

On the geometry of differential privacy

The Limits of Differential Privacy in Online Learning

Generating Location Traces With Semantic- Constrained Local Differential Privacy