Abstract:This paper constructs a supply chain model consisting of two manufacturers and one platform, where the platform provides sales service to enhance the demand. The platform has demand information and decides whether and with which manufacturer to share the information. In practice, if the platform shares the information, the manufacturer can use the shared information to guide pricing decisions and further use Consumer-to-Manufacturer (C2M) strategy to drive product production. C2M means that the manufacturer produces products based on the shared information, making products satisfy consumers' needs, thereby increasing the market demand. Therefore, this paper uses a theoretical model to answer a key question: considering the role of C2M, whether the platform prefers to share demand information with others, and if the platform shares, which strategy is most beneficial to each player? First, this paper obtains the optimal equilibrium solutions under three strategies, that is, no information sharing (strategy NN ), information sharing with one manufacturer (strategy SN or strategy NS ), and information sharing with two manufacturers (strategy SS ). Second, this paper derives that the information effect is the highest for all players under strategy SS . Whether the platform shares information with one or two manufacturers, the market effect has positive influences on both players. The cost effect does not affect the platform but hurts the informed manufacturer. Third, the conditions of the platform sharing information are obtained. There is a sales service efficiency threshold, if the sales service is more efficient, the platform shares the information with one manufacturer; otherwise, strategy SS is optimal. Fourth, through comparative analysis, this paper points out that when the C2M costs are lower, both manufacturers prefer the platform to choose strategy SS . Interestingly, when the C2M costs are higher, both manufacturers want the competitor to have information, which is different from the conclusions of previous studies. In addition, strategy SS makes the platform, and two manufacturers achieve Pareto optimality under certain conditions. Finally, the results are verified by numerical experiments.

Information Sharing in a Collectors-Led Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Impact Of Information Sharing Modes On The Dual-Channel Closed Loop Supply Chains Under Different Power Structures

To Share or Not to Share? The Role of Retailer’s Information Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Information Sharing Strategies in a Hybrid-Format Online Retailing Supply Chain

The Value of Information Sharing in a Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Strategic information sharing in the dual-channel closed loop supply chain with nonlinear production cost

Demand Information Forecasting and Sharing in a Remanufacturing Closed‐Loop Supply Chain

Information Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Learning Effect and Technology Licensing

Information Sharing in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Consumers' Free Riding

Hybrid Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Different Collection Competition in Reverse Channel

Manufacturer's Channel Strategy and Demand Information Sharing in a Retailer-Led Green Supply Chain

Collection Channel Selection Strategy for a Supply Chain Considering Incomplete Remanufacturing and Shared Environmental Responsibility

Information sharing strategy in supply chains: The role of C2M

Information Sharing Across Multiple Buyers in a Supply Chain.

Information Sharing In A Supply Chain With Learning Effect

Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer

Information Sharing in A Make-To-Stock Supply Chain

Information Sharing in a Competitive Supply Chain with Capacity Constraint

The value of information sharing in a dual-channel supply chain

Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets

Bilateral information sharing in a supply chain with manufacturer competition