Prognostic Value of Different Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy.

Zhi-Jie Zhao,Di Chen,Lai-Yang Zhou,Zhao-Liang Sun,Bo-Cheng Wang,Dong-Fu Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001343
2022-01-01
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Abstract:Objective In this study, we investigate the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scores in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) and compare their predictive accuracy. Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between CT score (preoperative and postoperative) and mortality at 30 days after injury. The discriminatory power of preoperative and postoperative CT score was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for the established predictors of TBI outcomes showed that preoperative Rotterdam CT score (odds ratio [OR], 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–11.50; P = 0.030), postoperative Rotterdam CT score (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.63–10.66; P = 0.003), preoperative Stockholm CT score (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.42–8.18; P = 0.006), postoperative Stockholm CT score (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.60–12.64; P = 0.004), preoperative Helsinki CT score (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03–2.02; P = 0.031), and postoperative Helsinki CT score (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.32–4.95; P = 0.005) were significantly associated with mortality. The performance of the postoperative Rotterdam CT score was superior to the preoperative Rotterdam CT score (AUC, 0.82–0.97 vs 0.71–0.91). The postoperative Stockholm CT score was superior to the preoperative Stockholm CT score (AUC, 0.76–0.94 vs 0.72–0.92). The postoperative Helsinki CT score was superior to the preoperative Helsinki CT score (AUC, 0.88–0.99 vs 0.65–0.87). Conclusions In conclusion, assessing the CT score before and after DC may be more precise and efficient for predicting early mortality in severe TBI patients who undergo DC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?