Effect of Teriparatide Versus Zoledronate on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Yu Xiong,Liang Li,Ping Liu,Bin Zhou,Yijun Kang,Guoqiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.021
IF: 2.21
2022-01-01
World Neurosurgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:We evaluated the efficacy of teriparatide versus zoledronate on spinal fusion in osteoporotic patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS:Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis undergoing PLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis were randomly assigned to receive either zoledronate or teriparatide. During the 2-year follow-up period, serial radiographs were used to determine fusion status and instrumentation-related sequelae (a composite of adjacent vertebral compressive fracture, instrumentation failure, and fusion failure). The bone mineral density (BMD) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were also serially measured. RESULTS:Of the 77 patients, 36 were in the teriparatide group and 41 in the zoledronate group and had completed the 2-year follow-up assessments. Bony union had been achieved more frequently in the teriparatide group than in the zoledronate group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), although the overall rate of bone union was comparable between the 2 groups. The incidence of instrumentation-related sequelae was also comparable between the 2 groups (teriparatide vs. zoledronate group, 13.9% vs. 22.0%). Regarding antiosteoporosis, the BMD values had significantly improved in both groups at the last follow-up. The teriparatide group had attained more BMD increments at 12 months postoperatively than had the zoledronate group. Furthermore, the ODI had consistently decreased in both groups with a lower ODI in the teriparatide group than in the zoledronate group at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, teriparatide showed superior bone union at 6 months and greater BMD improvement at 12 months after PLIF compared with zoledronate administration, although both resulted in similar overall effects on spinal fusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?