Impact of serum tenascin-C level on the long-term prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

丁怀玉,徐鸣悦,陈乐,吕浩,魏明丽,王俊杰,张波,黄榕翀
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20220224-00090
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the serum tenascin-C levels in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and its impact on the long-term prognosis.Methods:One hundred and thirteen STEMI patients who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University and successfully underwent emergency PCI from June 2015 to June 2016 were included in this prospective study. The serum tenascin-C levels were measured during hospitalization, and the patients were divided into tenascin-C ≥ 120 μg/L group and tenascin-C<120 μg/L group according to the serum tenascin-C level. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were observed during the 5 years follow up in all patients. According to the incidence of MACE, the patients were divided into MACE group and non-MACE group, and the predictive factors of MACE were analyzed. Continuous variables were presented as the mean±standard deviation and compared with the Student′s t-test. Categorical variables were presented as percentages and compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the value of serum tenascin-C level in predicting MACE in STEMI patients. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to compare the incidence of MACE between two groups. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the risk factors of MACE during the 5 years follow up.Results:The serum tenascin-C levels in the STEMI patients increased on the first day after the onset of disease (46.5±24.8 μg/L), peaked on the third day (97.5±41.2 μg/L), and then gradually decreased. All patients were followed up for 5 years. There were 37 cases of MACE, including 4 cases of cardiac death (3.5%), 14 cases of heart failure (12.4%), 14 cases of recurrent myocardial infarction or revascularization (12.4%), and 5 cases of stroke (4.4%). For prediction of MACE, the area under the curve of the serum TN-C level was 0.953 (95% CI 0.918-0.988, P<0.05), which was thus a valuable biomarker in predicting MACE for STEMI patients. The incidence of MACE in the group of tenascin-C≥120 μg/L group was higher than that in the group of tenascin-C<120 μg/L group (86.4% [19/22] vs 19.8% [18/91]), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that serum tenascin-C level was an independent predictor of MACE for STEMI patients during the 5 years follow-up ( HR=1.007, 95% CI 1.001-1.012, P<0.05). In addition, other variables including high sensitivity C-reactive protein ( HR=1.028, 95% CI 1.007-1.049, P<0.05), and cardiac troponin Ⅰ ( HR=1.004, 95% CI 1.000-1.008, P<0.05) were also found to be the independent predictors of MACE. Conclusions:The serum tenascin-C levels in STEMI patients increased significantly during the acute disease phase. Detecting the serum tenascin-C levels is valuable for predicting MACE in STEMI patients, and serum tenascin-C is an independent predictor of MACE in STEMI patients during the long-term follow-up period after acute myocardial infarction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?