Abstract:Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular measures to reveal causality influence of time series and has been widely applied in economics and neuroscience. Especially, its counterpart in frequency domain, spectral GC, as well as other Granger-like causality measures have recently been applied to study causal interactions between brain areas in different frequency ranges during cognitive and perceptual tasks. In this paper, we show that: 1) GC in time domain cannot correctly determine how strongly one time series influences the other when there is directional causality between two time series, and 2) spectral GC and other Granger-like causality measures have inherent shortcomings and/or limitations because of the use of the transfer function (or its inverse matrix) and partial information of the linear regression model. On the other hand, we propose two novel causality measures (in time and frequency domains) for the linear regression model, called new causality and new spectral causality, respectively, which are more reasonable and understandable than GC or Granger-like measures. Especially, from one simple example, we point out that, in time domain, both new causality and GC adopt the concept of proportion, but they are defined on two different equations where one equation (for GC) is only part of the other (for new causality), thus the new causality is a natural extension of GC and has a sound conceptual/theoretical basis, and GC is not the desired causal influence at all. By several examples, we confirm that new causality measures have distinct advantages over GC or Granger-like measures. Finally, we conduct event-related potential causality analysis for a subject with intracranial depth electrodes undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery, and show that, in the frequency domain, all measures reveal significant directional event-related causality, but the result from new spectral causality is consistent with event-related time-frequency power spectrum activity. The spectral GC as well as other Granger-like measures are shown to generate misleading results. The proposed new causality measures may have wide potential applications in economics and neuroscience.

Causality Fields in Nonlinear Causal Effect Analysis

Nonlinear Causal Discovery in Time Series

A Liang-Kleeman Causality Analysis based on Linear Inverse Modeling

Linear and nonlinear causality in financial markets

Causalized Convergent Cross Mapping and Its Implementation in Causality Analysis

Description Length Guided Nonlinear Unified Granger Causality Analysis

Embedding entropy: a nonlinear measure of dynamical causality

An Overview of the Quantitative Causality Analysis and Causal Graph Reconstruction Based on a Rigorous Formalism of Information Flow

Causality analysis of neural connectivity: critical examination of existing methods and advances of new methods.

Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding

Functional Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery

Evaluation of Causal Effects and Local Structure Learning of Causal Networks

Causal Inference in Nonlinear Systems: Granger Causality Versus Time-Delayed Mutual Information.

Statistical Approaches for Causal Inference

Causal Inference Based on the Analysis of Events of Relations for Non-stationary Variables

[Causality in Objective World: Directed Acyclic Graphs-based Structural Parsing].

A Survey of Causal Inference Frameworks

Reasoning of Causal Direction in Linear Model Based on Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient.

Nonlinearity, Feedback and Uniform Consistency in Causal Structural Learning

Deciphering Interactions in Causal Networks without Parametric Assumptions

Nonlinear Permuted Granger Causality