Molecular Subtyping of CD5+ Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on DNA-targeted Sequencing and Lymph2Cx.

Dongshen Ma,Yuhan Ma,Yuanyuan Ma,Jia Liu,Ying Gu,Nian Liu,Chenxi Xiang,Hui Liu,Wei Sang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.941347
IF: 4.7
2022-01-01
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:BackgroundCD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CD5+ DLBCL) showed poor prognosis in the rituximab era, with limited research on its genetic characteristics and cell of origin (COO). We aimed to demonstrate the molecular characteristics of CD5+ DLBCL and to discover potential prognostic factors. MethodsWe included 24 cases of CD5+ DLBCL and 23 CD5-negative (CD5-) counterparts and collected their clinicopathological features. Targeted DNA sequencing of 475 lymphoma-related genes was performed, and all cases were assigned to distinct genetic subtypes using the LymphGen tool. The COO was determined by the Lymph2Cx assay. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to identify the possible prognostic factors. ResultsCompared with their CD5- counterparts, patients with CD5+ DLBCL tended to have a worse prognosis and a higher incidence of MYD88L265P and CD79B double mutation (MCD) subtype (54.17%, P = 0.005) and activated B cell-like (ABC) subtype (62.5%, P = 00017), as determined by next-generation sequencing and Lymph2Cx, respectively. Moreover, PIM1, MYD88, and KMT2D mutations were detected more frequently in CD5+ DLBCL cases (P < 0.05). According to multivariate analysis, MYC/BCL2 double expression and ABC subtype were correlated with unfavorable overall survival (OS). High mRNA expression of SERPINA9 and MME showed a significant correlation with a better OS, and high expression of MME showed a significant correlation with better progression-free survival in CD5+ DLBCL. ConclusionThe genetic profile of CD5+ DLBCL is characterized by PIM1, MYD88, and KMT2D mutations, with a higher incidence of MCD and ABC subtypes. MYC/BCL2 double expression, ABC subtype, and mRNA expression of SERPINA9 and MME are independently predictive of the prognosis of CD5+ DLBCL.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?