Abstract:In the event of a disabled submarine a pressurized rescue module (PRM) may be deployed. Safe deployment of the PRM depends on understanding the challenges should failures occur. If a PRM were to become disabled, temperature and humidity are predicted to rise quickly, and submariners may need to endure environments approaching 35°C, 95% relative humidity (RH) until rescued. Models predicting increases in core temperature (i.e., hyperthermia) and the magnitude of hypohydration incurred over 24 h in 95% RH environments yield physiologically impossible outcomes at ambient temperatures ≥32°C. Thus, it is not possible to accurately predict the magnitudes of hyperthermia and hypohydration during prolonged exposures to warm and very humid environments. By extension, the fluid prescription required to prevent unsafe levels of hypohydration, defined as a loss of body weight >4%, in a disabled PRM is also unknown.PurposeTest the hypothesis that the predicted magnitudes of hyperthermia and hypohydration during a 24 h exposure to a 95% RH environment are dependent on ambient temperature.Methods10 healthy males (23 ± 3 y) sat in a 95 ± 2% RH normobaric environment for 8 h on three occasions separated by ≥7 days. Trials differed by temperature (32 ± 0°C, 33 ± 0°C, 35 ± 0°C). The order of the trials was randomly assigned. Subjects were not allowed to eat or drink throughout. Core temperature (telemetry pill) and percent changes in body weight (%ΔBW), an index of changes in total body water, were measured every hour. Sweat rate was calculated from %ΔBW. Linear regression models were fit to core temperature (over the final 3 h of exposure), and %ΔBW and sweat rate (over the entire 8 h exposure) over time for each subject. The resulting equations were used to predict the magnitudes of hyperthermia, %ΔBW, and sweat losses for up to 24 h. The volume of fluid required to prevent >4% loss of body weight was calculated accordingly. Data are presented as mean ± SD.ResultsAt the end of the 8 h exposure, core temperature was higher in 35°C (38.0 ± 0.3°C, P<0.01) compared to 32°C (37.6 ± 0.2°C) and 33°C (37.5 ± 0.2°C). At this time, %ΔBW was greater in 35°C (−2.0 ± 0.5%, P<0.01) compared to 32°C (−1.5 ± 0.5%) and 33°C (−1.7 ± 0.4%). At 24 h, predicted core temperature was higher in 35°C (39.0 ± 1.1°C, P<0.01) compared to 32°C (37.7 ± 1.0°C) and 33°C (37.8 ± 0.9°C), and the predicted %ΔBW was greater in 35°C (−6.1 ± 1.2%, P<0.01) compared to 32°C (−4.5 ± 1.2%) and 33°C (−5.3 ± 1.3%). Predicted sweat loss at 24 h was greater in 35°C (−5.2 ± 1.4 L, P<0.01) compared to 32°C (−3.8 ± 1.6 L) and 33°C (−4.4 ± 1.1 L). The predicted fluid prescription required to prevent >4% loss of body weight was greater in 35°C (1.8 ± 0.9 L) compared to 32°C (0.7 ± 0.8 L, P<0.02), and 33°C (1.0 ± 0.8 L, P=0.06).ConclusionIn a 95% RH environment, the magnitudes of hyperthermia and hypohydration predicted to occur during a 24 h exposure are dependent on ambient temperature. Moreover, the volume of fluid required to prevent >4% loss in body weight during a 24 h exposure in ambient temperatures ≤35°C is ~1.8 L.Support or Funding InformationNaval Sea Systems Command Award N00024‐18‐C‐4316.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Do the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommendations for Working in the Heat Prevent Excessive Hyperthermia and Body Mass Loss in Unacclimatized Males?

Do the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Recommendations Prevent Hyperthermia and Dehydration?

Water Consumption Patterns Impact Hydration Markers in Males Working in Accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommendations.

Voluntary Drinking Prevents Dehydration Across Work Intensities when Adhering Occupational Heat Stress Recommendations

Adhering to occupational heat stress recommendations attenuates kidney injury risk

Violation of Allowable Work Intensity Does Not Augment Acute Kidney Injury Risk During Simulated Occupational Heat Stress

Hydration Status Response to Bolus Frequency and Volume Intake During Exercise in Heat

Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity

Hydration As a Modulator of Renal Vascular Control During Physical Work in the Heat

Human Thermoregulation During Prolonged Exposure to Warm and Extremely Humid Environments Expected to Occur in Disabled Submarine Scenarios

The effect of heat mitigation strategies on thermoregulation and productivity during simulated occupational work in the heat in physically active young men

Effect of cold beverages on whole‐body heat exchange in young and older males during intermittent exercise in the heat

Predicting the Magnitudes of Hyperthermia and Hypohydration During Prolonged Exposures to Warm and Very Humid Environments

Kidney Injury Risk Does Not Differ Between Men and Women During Work in the Heat

Ad libitum water consumption off-sets the thermal and cardiovascular strain exacerbated by dehydration during a 3-h simulated heatwave

High Temperature Impairs Cognitive Performance During a Moderate Intensity Activity

Plateau in Core Temperature during Shorter but Not Longer Work/Rest Cycles in Heat

Efficacy of Cooling Centers for Mitigating Physiological Strain in Older Adults during Daylong Heat Exposure: A Laboratory-Based Heat Wave Simulation

Multiple Days of Heat Exposure on Firefighters' Work Performance and Physiology

Glomerular Filtration Rate is Maintained During Extreme Passive Heat Exposure

Thermal and Cardiovascular Responses During a Very Hot and Dry Heatwave Simulation in Young and Older Adults