A phase <scp>II</scp> study of antiangiogenic therapy (Apatinib) plus chemotherapy as second‐line treatment in advanced small cell lung cancer

Yinghui Xu,Xu Wang,Chao Sun,Zhiru Gao,Hua He,Shi Qiu,Ye Guo,Xiaohui Ma,Junya Song,Kewei Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5217
IF: 4.711
2022-01-01
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:AbstractIntroductionCurrently, only a few options are available for the treatment of patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) after the failure of first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus chemotherapy for second‐line treatment of advanced SCLC.Patients and MethodsThis prospective clinical trial recruited patients treated with apatinib plus second‐line chemotherapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Logrank test power analysis was used for calculating samples. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsA total of 29/31 enrolled patients were available for response evaluation until October 2019. The ORR and DCR were 27.59% (8/29) and 96.55% (28/29), respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.36 months and 14.16 months, respectively, indicating better efficacy compared with the standard second‐line chemotherapies. The most common adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (41.94%, 13/31), followed by leucopenia (35.48%, 11/31) and thrombocytopenia (25.81%, 8/31). The grade 3–4 AEs occurred in 12 (38.71%) patients, of which neutropenia (19.35%, 6/31), leucopenia (9.68%, 3/31), and proteinuria (6.45%, 2/31) were most common. Patients receiving an initial dose of apatinib 250 mg had a better tolerance.ConclusionAntiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy had encouraging efficacy in advanced SCLC patients, which provides an insight into the current status of second‐line therapy in SCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?