1264P Updated Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy Vs Chemotherapy Alone As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (SQ NSCLC)
J. Wang,S. Lu,C. Hu,Y. Sun,K. Yang,M. Chen,J. Zhao,G. Yu,X. Zhou,G. Feng,Y. Pan,Y. Yu,J. Zhang,L. Liang,X. Lin,X. Wu,J. Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1578
IF: 51.769
2020-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Tislelizumab, a monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody, + chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and had antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. In this open-label phase 3 study (NCT03594747), 360 Chinese pts with SQ NSCLC (randomized 1:1:1) received IV Q3W: tislelizumab 200 mg (D1) + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (D1) and carboplatin AUC 5 (D1) in Arm A; tislelizumab + nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (D1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin in Arm B; or paclitaxel and carboplatin in Arm C. Patients were stratified by disease stage (IIIB vs IV) and tumor cell PD-L1 expression (<1% vs 1-49% vs ≥50%) via VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay. The primary endpoint was PFS (RECIST v1.1) by Independent Review Committee; secondary endpoints included ORR, DoR, OS, and safety/tolerability. Association of blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) with efficacy was explored. Combination therapy (Arms A and B) had significantly improved PFS and higher ORR/DoR vs chemotherapy (C). There was no association between PD-L1 expression and PFS or ORR (Table). With an optimized bTMB cutoff of 6 mut/Mb (selected by ROC), combination therapy improved PFS over chemotherapy in pts with high- (HR, 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.67) and low-bTMB (HR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27, 1.59). Median OS was not reached in any arm. Discontinuation of any treatment due to AEs was reported in 12.5%, 29.7%, and 15.4% of pts in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AE was decreased neutrophil count, in line with known hematological toxicities of chemotherapy. Six treatment-related AEs led to death (n=1 [A]; n=2 [B]; n=3 [C]); none were solely attributed to tislelizumabTable: 1264PITT Population N=360Arm A n=120Arm B n=119Arm C n=121Median PFS, mo7.67.65.5HRa0.520.48P-valueb0.0001<0.0001ORR, %72.574.849.6Median DoR8.28.64.2PD-L1 ≥50% N=125Arm A n=42Arm B n=42Arm C n=41Median PFS, mo7.67.65.5HRc0.500.43ORR, %78.688.153.7PD-L1 1-49% N=91Arm A n=30Arm B n=30Arm C n=31Median PFS, mo7.6NE4.2HRc0.440.31ORR, %70.066.741.9PD-L1 <1% N=144Arm A n=48Arm B n=47Arm C n=49Median PFS, mo7.67.45.5HRc0.640.69ORR, %68.868.151.0Abbreviations: DoR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; mo, months; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival. aStratified; bOne-sided log-rank test; cNon-stratified. Open table in a new tab . Abbreviations: DoR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; mo, months; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival. aStratified; bOne-sided log-rank test; cNon-stratified. In pts with SQ NSCLC, combination therapy significantly improved clinical outcomes vs chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression and bTMB. The safety profile was similar to those of tislelizumab, chemotherapy, and underlying NSCLC, with no new safety signals.