Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Xin-Yu Sun,Yu Lin,Wei Guo,Xiao-Ming Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2022.2096244
2022-01-01
Nutrition and Cancer
Abstract:This study aimed to quantitatively identify the prognostic and clinicopathological value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a meta-analysis. The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched from inception to December 14, 2021. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of GNRI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs were combined to estimate the clinicopathological significance of the GNRI in NSCLC. Seven studies with 2,023 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A low GNRI score was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.01, 95%CI = 1.65-2.44, p < 0.001) and worse progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.48-2.22, p < 0.001) in NSCLC. Furthermore, a low GNRI score was significantly associated with the histological type of non-adenocarcinoma (OR= 1.55, 95%CI = 1.19-2.03, p = 0.001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >= 2 (OR= 2.81, 95%CI= 1.49-5.32, p = 0.001). A low GNRI score is a significant and effective prognostic marker for poor survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC. In addition, low GNRI score was correlated with higher ECOG PS scores.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?