Abstract:Ecological compensation has been adopted in many countries and proved a good approach to protect environment.The focus of ecological compensation study was how to set ecological compensation standard.The ecological compensation standard was assessed mainly based on the methods of market value approach,opportunity cost approach,willingness to pay approach and cost analysis approach.Thus,the ecological footprint(EF) was applied rarely.The EF was defined as the biologically productive land and water a population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb part of the waste generated by fossil and nuclear fuel consumption.The EF provides an aggregate estimate of demands upon the biophysical productivity and waste assimilation capacity of nature imposed by human lifestyles.This aggregate indicator permits the estimation of the equivalent land/sea area,or biosphere,required to support productive activities.Its unique attribute is that it accounts for the demand upon natural resources,in terms of an equivalent land/sea area,or global hectares.The EF method has been proposed as a standard methodology to evaluate the environmental implications of alternative development models.The EF analysis becomes widely adopted as a key environmental indicator of sustainable development. River ecosystem services imply the natural environmental conditions and their effectiveness formed and sustained by river ecosystem and its ecological processes,on which,human life relies of existence.Ecological supply footprint was defined as the enhanced river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The enhanced ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Ecological demand footprint was defined as the weakened river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The weakened ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Five value models(ecological supply footprint models of flooding control,hydropower,reservoir irrigation,improve waterway and reservoir breeding.) of ecological compensation subject and eight loss models(ecological demand footprint models of reservoir sedimentation,reservoir inundation,construction of resettlement area,soil and water erosion,river ecosystem occupied by project,energy consumption of project construction,sewage discharge of project construction,and produce cement and steel.) of ecological compensation object were established based on the idea of ecological footprint on Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project(ZWCP).And the ecological compensation standard of ZWCP was evaluated by the models.The results show that: ① Five ecological supply footprints were 88482.2974 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 6.2353×108Yuan RMB annually.Eight ecological demand footprints were 14946.4861 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 1.0533×108Yuan RMB annually.The values were the losses′ 5.92 times.② Three schemes of ecological compensation standard were proposed,on the premise of identifying the ecological compensation subject and the ecological compensation object.The second scheme was recommended.③ The second scheme of Ecological compensation standard on ZWCP was 0.5238×108 Yuan RMB annually.The central-local government and hydropower development owner were the main ecological compensation subjects,which undertook 52.50% and 35.77% of ecological compensation standard respectively.The resettlements and the river ecosystem were the main ecological compensation object,which obtained 72.16% and 15.68% of ecological compensation standard respectively.

Calculation of Ecological Compensation Standard in a Small Watershed—based on the Ecological Service Function Value Method

Quantitative Standard of Eco-Compensation for the Water Source Area in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China

Estimation of Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Ecological Service Value Calculation

Ecological Compensation Based on the Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of the Xin’an River Basin in China

A Quantitative Assessment on Ecological Compensation Based on Water Resources Value Accounting: A Case Study of Water Source Area of the Middle Route of South-To-North Water Transfer Project in China

How to Determine the Payment Amount of Ecological Compensation: Based on the Theories and Methods of Ecological Economics

Using Ecosystem Service Flows to Inform Ecological Compensation: Theory & Application

Accounting Methods Research for Ecological Compensation Standard in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on Supply Cost

Determining the Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Forest Multifunction Evaluation and Financial Net Present Value Analysis: A Case Study in Southwestern Guangxi, China

A Research on the Payment Standard of Ecological Compensation for Forbidden and Limited Development Areas

How to measure the ecological compensation threshold in the upper Yangtze River basin, China? An approach for coupling InVEST and grey water footprint

Ecological Compensation Estimation of Soil and Water Conservation Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis

A study on ecological compensation standard for Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project based on the idea of ecological footprint

Calculation of Ecological Compensation Standards for Arable Land Based on the Value Flow of Support Services

Identification of Ecological Compensation Zones and Compensation Amounts: A Case Study of the Yellow River Delta

Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product

Ecological Compensation For Large Water Projects Based On Ecological Footprint Theory: A Case Study In China

How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios

Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value and cross regional ecological compensation in the Yangtze River Basin

Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Establishment of Watershed Ecological Compensation Standards

Accounting of Ecological Compensation Standards of Main Function Zones