Abstract:This dataset contains a set of nanopore translocation current traces. It is divided in two parts. Part I: This part contains artificially generated traces with different levels of background noise (SNR = 4, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.25) For each noise level, three parameters are varied in data generation: a. Twenty different concentrations of nanoparticles as the analytes (Cnp): 0.013, 0.016, 0.020, 0.025, 0.032, 0.040, 0.050, 0.063, 0.080, 0.1, 0.13, 0.16, 0.20, 0.25, 0.32, 0.40, 0.50, 0.63, 0.80, and 1, with the unit of nano-molar, [nM]. b. Fifteen different diameters of the nanoparticles (Dnp): 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, with the unit of nanometer, [nm]. c. Five different translocation durations (Duration): 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0, with the unit of millisecond, [ms]. In total we have 20*15*5=1500 current traces for each SNR. There are three datasets: training, validation and test. Traces in training datasets are of 20 seconds, traces in validation and test datasets are 10 seconds long. For SNR = 4, training, validation and test datasets are provided. For other SNRs, only test traces are provided. Pert II: This part contains real experimental datasets, the translocation of Lambda DNA and Streptavidin with 6 current traces each at different bias voltages. Each Lambda DNA trace has 71 seconds, while each Streptavidin trace has 126 seconds. Two truncated pyramid shape nanopores were used in our experiments, one with a side length of 7.5 nm and another 16 nm, both in a 55 nm-thick silicon layer, for DNA and protein streptavidin translocation, respectively. The DNA and streptavidin were dispersed in 500 mM KCl electrolyte with a concentration of 78 pM and 84 nM, respectively.Details of artificially generated data and experimental data can be found in our paper: Dario Dematties, Chenyu Wen, Mauricio David Pérez, Dian Zhou, Shi-Li Zhang. Deep learning of nanopore sensing signals using a bi-path network. arXiv:2105.03660. Trained and Validated Models In this data set we also include all the trained and best validated models evaluated in our paper. Nanopore Translocation Detector Trained and Validated Models In this data set we also include all the trained and best validated models evaluated in our newer paper: A Generalized Transformer-Based Pulse Detection Algorithm

A Generalized Transformer-Based Pulse Detection Algorithm

Deep learning of nanopore sensing signals using a bi-path network

Detection of Dispersed Radio Pulses: A machine learning approach to candidate identification and classification

Enhancing Coincidence Time Resolution of PET Detectors Using Short-Time Fourier Transform and Residual Neural Network

Model-Based Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection and Classification at High Event Rates

TransPicker: a Transformer-based Framework for Particle Picking in Cryoem Micrographs

A Robust Beat-to-Beat Artifact Detection Algorithm for Pulse Wave

Pulse wave detection algorithm based on wavelet transform and morphology

Pulse shape discrimination based on the Tempotron: a powerful classifier on GPU

Nanopore Translocation Signal

Transformer-CNN hybrid network for improving PET time of flight prediction

PulseDL-II: A System-on-Chip Neural Network Accelerator for Timing and Energy Extraction of Nuclear Detector Signals

Pulsar candidate identification using advanced transformer-based models

Boosting Photon-Number-Resolved Detection Rates of Transition-Edge Sensors by Machine Learning

Single-Cycle Pulse Signal Recognition Based on One-Dimensional Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Pulse Signal Analysis Based on Deep Learning Network

A New Algorithm for Measuring Pulse Transit Time from ECG and PPG Signals

Energy and Timing Measurement with Time-Based Detector Readout for PET Applications: Principle and Validation with Discrete Circuit Components.

Pulse Shape Simulation and Discrimination using Machine-Learning Techniques

A Time-Series Signal Classification Algorithm and Its Application to Nanopore Ionic Current Signal Identification