Association between disposition index and adverse pregnancy outcomes among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study

苏莹莹,沈赟,王亚昕,马晓静,包玉倩,郑燕伟,陶敏芳,周健
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20220403-00140
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the relationship between disposition index (DI) and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods:A total of 1 912 women were prospectively recruited from January 2015 to December 2017 in Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People′s Hospital. According to whether they had GDM, they were divided into GDM group (434 cases) and non-GDM group (1 478 cases). All participants received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during the 24-28 gestational weeks and completebasal and delivery information was collected. The insulin sensitivity index (ISI) and the area under the insulin curve/area under the blood glucose curve (AUC INS120/AUC GLU120) were calculated from the results of the 75 g OGTT. The DI was calculated as the product of the ISI and AUC INS120/AUC GLU120 and then log transformed. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as large for gestational age (LGA), primary cesarean section, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. Comparison between groups was performed by t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 test. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between DI and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results:Women with GDM had a lower ISI even DI than women without GDM. Compared with women with GDM in the lowest quartile ( Q1, DI<2.90) of DI, multivariable adjusted (age, body mass index, other pregnancy complications, gestational age at the time of OGTT, fetal sex and parity) odds ratios (OR) of adverse pregnancy outcomes of those in the second ( Q2, DI 2.90-3.02), third ( Q3, DI 3.03-3.16), and highest ( Q4, DI>3.16) quartiles of DI were reduced by 55% (95%CI 0.23-0.87), 34% (95%CI 0.35-1.25), and 59% (95%CI 0.24-0.71) ( P for trend=0.01), respectively. When DI was considered as a continuous variable, the multivariable adjusted OR of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM was reduced by 60% (95%CI 0.21-0.73) for each one unit increase in DI. However, DI was not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without GDM (OR=0.66, 95%CI 0.36-1.18). Conclusion:Elevated DI levels in women with GDM are closely associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?