Efficacy of radiotherapy combined with temozolomide in the treatment of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

赖名耀,李少群,李娟,胡清军,甄俊杰,周江芬,周兆明,周成,艾茹玉,山常国,蔡林波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20220225-00112
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ vs. that without adjuvant TMZ in the treatment of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Methods:The clinical data of 85 children with DIPG who were treated in the Comprehensive Oncology Center, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital from January 2010 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy (total dose 50-54 Gy/27-33 f) combined with temozolomide(75 mg·m -2·d -1) chemotherapy. Then according to the guardians, patients received or not 6 cycles temozolomide chemotherapy one month later after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. All patients were divided into radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ + adjuvant TMZ group (66 cases), radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ group (19 cases). The Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn to compare the difference in survival time between the two groups. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0), the differences in adverse drug reactions between the two groups were evaluated. Results:The median follow-up time of the 85 patients was 9 months (3-28 months), and the overall median survival time was 9 months. The median survival time of the radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ + adjuvant TMZ group was 10 months, and that of the radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ group was 6 months. The log-rank test showed that the difference in survival time between the two groups was statistically significant ( P=0.002). Among the 85 children, 30 (35.3%) had hematological adverse reactions, all of which were CTCAE grades 1-3. There were 24 cases (36.4%) in the radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ + adjuvant TMZ group of 66 cases, including 15 cases of grade 1, 8 cases of grade 2 and 1 case of grade 3. Among the 19 patients in the radiotherapy + concurrent TMZ group, 6 patients (31.6%) developed adverse hematologic reactions, all of which were grade 1. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse reactions of the hematological system between the two groups ( P=0.255). Conclusion:Compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TMZ alone, that followed by adjuvant TMZ can prolong the survival time of children with DIPG without increasing the incidence of adverse drug reactions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?