Association of Anxiety and Unspecified Emotional Distress Obtained from a Medical Records Linkage System with Incident Cognitive Outcomes in a Population-Based Setting

Jeremy A. Syrjanen,Janina Krell-Roesch,Walter K. Kremers,Julie A. Fields,Eugene L. Scharf,David S. Knopman,Ronald C. Petersen,Maria Vassilaki,Yonas E. Geda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-240213
2024-07-13
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Abstract:Background: Studies that assess cognition prospectively and study in detail anxiety history in the participants' medical records within the context of brain aging and Alzheimer's disease are limited. Objective: To examine the associations of anxiety and unspecified emotional distress (UED) acquired throughout a person's life with prospectively collected cognitive outcomes. Methods: Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants who were cognitively unimpaired at baseline were included. Anxiety and UED data were abstracted from the medical record using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) resources and were run separately as predictors in our models. The data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models for the outcomes of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia and using linear mixed effects models for the outcomes of global and domain specific cognitive z-scores and included key covariates. Results: The study sample (n = 1,808) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 74.5 (7.3) years and 51.4% were male. Anxiety was associated with increased risk of MCI and dementia and was associated with lower baseline cognitive z-scores and accelerated decline over time in the global, memory, and attention domains. UED was associated with faster decline in all domains except visuospatial but did not show evidence of association with incident cognitive outcomes. These results varied by medication use and timing of anxiety. Conclusions: Anxiety and UED both showed inverse associations with cognition. Utilization of anxiety and UED data from across the life course, as available, from the REP system adds robustness to our results.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?