Comparative Analysis Between Directly Measured and Parent-Evaluated Executive Function: Predicting Children's Academic Achievement and Social Development in a One-Year Longitudinal Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s461720
IF: 3.974
2024-06-05
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Ke Yin, 1 Qiong Wu, 2 Xiaosong Gai 1 1 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, People's Republic of China; 2 Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Qiong Wu, Tel +86 13504314652, Fax +86 85683180, Email Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine differences between directly measured and parent-evaluated executive function in predicting children's academic achievement and social development, and to explore the mediating roles of peer status and social competence in the effects of executive function on social behavior. Patients and Methods: The study followed 106 first-grade children in an elementary school in China for one year. Regression and mediation analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 21.0 to test the hypotheses. Results: First, in a comparison of the predictive role of directly measured and parent-evaluated executive function, directly measured executive function played a more important role in predicting academic achievement, while parent-evaluated executive function played a greater role in predicting social development. Second, parent-evaluated executive function influenced social behavior primarily through social competence and peer status, with social competence playing a more significant mediating role than peer status. Conclusion: Compared with previous studies, the results of the present study provide more direct evidence for the relationship and differences between directly measured and parent-evaluated executive function, further suggesting that they have different efficacy and predictive goals, while the present study also describes the pathways through which executive function influences social behavior: the mediating role of peer status and social competence. This suggests that, on the one hand, educators or researchers need to choose appropriate measures of executive function for their own purposes and, on the other hand, in order to promote the development of children's social behavior, they need to focus on the development of children's executive function, social competence and peer relationships. Keywords: peer status, social behavior, social competence, cognitive control, measurement Executive function (EF) generally refers to a series of top-down mental processes that a person performs to overcome his or her automatic responses, instincts, or intuitions when focusing attention. 1 Miyake et al found that executive function is not a single cognitive structure, but a collection of cognitive functions, including inhibitory control, working memory updating, and cognitive flexibility. 2 The three subcomponents are related to each other. The three subcomponents are interconnected but fundamentally different and functionally separate, 3 and on the basis of these subcomponents, individuals are able to construct more advanced executive functions such as reasoning, problem solving, and planning. 4,5 Furthermore, Zelazo et al divided executive functions into two categories: "hot" executive functions associated with the orbitofrontal cortex and "cool" executive functions associated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. 6 The former is characterised by a high degree of emotional involvement, requiring flexible evaluation of the emotional significance of stimuli; the latter is more likely to be triggered by relatively abstract, decontextualised problems. Executive function is not only closely related to academic achievement and social development in young children, 7–9 but it is also an important and stable predictor of children's academic achievement and social development. 10–15 Good executive function (good performance on inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility) can help individuals better plan, regulate attention, and retain relevant information in learning or social environments, thereby promoting their academic achievement or social development. 16,17 However, previous research exploring the relationship between executive function and academic achievement or social behavior in young children often did not consider the potential impact of the measurement method of executive function on the research conclusions. 18–22 Additionally, there has been a scarcity of studies investigating potential mediating factors between executive function and social behavior. Given this, it is necessary to further research the predictive or influencing role of executive function on academic achievement or social development, in order to deepen researchers' understanding of the relationships between these variables. Directly measured executive function rely on c -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary