Abstract:Morality, being understood as a form of value-normative regulation, as a set of norms, commandments, ideas, was actively involved in the mechanics of Auschwitz. One of the key concepts of Nazi morality is “humane” killing: the Nazis’ understanding of it as “humane” is connected with an idea of fighting evil, with the fact that its performer morally justifies and motivates it (with the good of others, including the victim), with a method of its realisation, which should be merciful towards both the killer and his victim. In Nazi morality, the “virtuous” person takes the decision to kill on the basis of moral ideology; killing as an actual action, as a given one, turns out to be outside of morality. They reproduce the mistake of Adam, who took the words of god’s truth for a commandment, a law, which is described by Spinoza. Criticizing the single-level position of moral commandments, the author comes to the conclusion that Auschwitz is opposed not by the commandment, not by the moral prohibition “Thou shalt not kill”, but by non-killing as an act. Philosophy, having emphasized the fundamental nature of human mortality, is forced by Auschwitz to place the concept of killing at the center and postulate the givenness of non-killing as a primary act – outside of verbal expression, consideration, distinction: as the beginning that makes the language, the thinking and the individual as an acting human possible. This means a turn of moral philosophy: from the substantive development of moral ideology and the specification of morality through the nuance of motives, norms and values – back to the givenness of an act, which excludes the differentiation of killing on moral grounds. The act of non-killing is not mediated by morality, it is not defined by the fact that killing is evil, but the very fact that it is evil follows from the primacy of the act of not committing killing, from the decision not to kill given in the act of non-killing. Moral philosophy itself is conceived by the author as the thinking of the one who does not kill.

Normative Impulsivity: Adorno on Ethics and the Body

Against the Natural Consciousness of Time: Trauma and Ethics in Jean Améry's Beyond Guilt and Atonement

Business Ethics from the Standpoint of Redemption: Adorno on the Possibility of Good Work

Erich Fromm: Ancestor of Social Psychoanalytic Practice

“The Primacy of the Object”: Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory and the Return of Form

Non-Killing as the Primary Act

The Authoritarian Personality Revisited: Reading Adorno in the Age of Trump

Hannah Arendt's Moral Ontology: Comments on David Luban's Arendt on the Crime of Crimes

Logical Given, Interactive Negotiation and Self-Denial of Self-Consciousness-Hegelian Pragmatism in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy and Its Critique

The Synesthesia of Values: How the Ideals of Modernist Design Predisposed and Shaped Fascist Legal and Political Thought

Living After Auschwitz: Memory, Culture and Biopolitics in the Work of Bernard Stiegler and Giorgio Agamben

Notes Toward an Aesthetics of Violence

In the shadow of dark times: Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and the problem of thinking in modern era

Moral dumbfounding and imaginative resistance

Awakening to Our Implicated Selves: Paralysis, Disorientation and What's at Stake Psychically

Two asymmetries in population and general normative ethics

The inhuman challenge: Writing with dark desire

Totally Administered Heteronomy: Adorno on Work, Leisure, and Politics in the Age of Digital Capitalism

Socially necessary superfluity: Adorno and Marx on the crises of labor and the individual

Minding the Body: Space, Memory, and Visual Culture in Constructions of Jewish Identity

Art and the Reenchantment of Sensuous Human Activity