Abstract:Copyrighted works are greatly entwined with the concept of the sharing economy because of their status as informational public goods. Unlike commercial sharing models that address tangible goods such as bikes and houses, the sharing of which is limited by their physical nature, sharing models for intangible copyrighted works such as Google Books and live game webcasting must account for the comparatively unfettered ability for these to be shared. Accordingly, these models are more focused on exploiting such works to their full commercial potential. However, these sharing models are to a large extent based on the unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted works and will be unworkable if the related copyright issues cannot be solved. The interest that copyright owners have in exclusivity must thus be balanced with the public's interest in further exploitation of copyrighted works. Article 22 of the Copyright Law of China outlines an exhaustive list of copyright exceptions; such a restrictive list is incompatible with the sharing economy. The Chinese courts have realised this problem and have gone beyond the law in their judgments, taking a cue from their US counterparts. However, many of these decisions appear to be inconsistent with one another. To address the aforementioned problems, this paper examines the latest proposed amendment to the Copyright Law of China and proposes several legislative and judicial actions that could help promote the sharing economy. At the legislative level, enacting legislation based on a refined open-ended fair use model is necessary to promote the development of the sharing economy. At the judicial level, Chinese courts should employ the concept of transformative use to correctly interpret legislation based on the proposed open-ended model. With transformative use as the cornerstone of copyright policy, the public gains the freedom to share others’ works, participate in the innovation process, and create works with new value. Moreover, authors would retain an incentive to create works under such a legal regime because market substitution will not occur if a work is used for a different expressive purpose than that for which the work was originally created. Thus, a balance can be achieved between promoting the sharing economy and protecting the exclusivity of copyright in China.

Decentralized Content Censorship for Creator Economy

When Curation Becomes Creation: Algorithms, Microcontent, and the Vanishing Distinction between Platforms and Creators

Blockchain Censorship

Exploring Network Content Ecosystem Evaluation Model Based on Chinese Judicial Discourse of Digital Platform

Building a Personalized Model for Social Media Textual Content Censorship.

Social Media, Content Moderation, and Technology

Copyright Protection and Risk Prevention of Short Video Platform

SEnD: A Social Network Friendship Enhanced Decentralized System to Circumvent Censorships

Content governance mechanism of social e-commerce platform from the perspective of information ecology: A case study of Xiaohongshu

Emerging Regulations on Content Moderation and Misinformation Policies of Online Media Platforms: Accommodating the Duty of Care into Intermediary Liability Models

Reliable, Fair and Decentralized Marketplace for Content Sharing Using Blockchain

User-Generated Content Regulation for Mixed Two-Sided Platforms

Competent Third Parties and Content Moderation on Platforms: Potentials of Independent Decision-Making Bodies From A Governance Structure Perspective

A dynamic model of censorship

To Share is Fair: the Changing Face of China's Fair Use Doctrine in the Sharing Economy and Beyond.

Copyright Governance for Online Short Videos: Perspective of Transaction Cost Economics

Platform Coordination of the Sponsored Contents: A Game-Theoretical Analysis

Content Censorship in the InterPlanetary File System

Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework

Digital Content Creation: An Analysis of the Impact of Recommendation Systems

Evolutionary Game Analysis of UGC Copyright Infringement Governance