Abstract:Conflict adaptation is an important phenomenon, as the interference effect on the current trials is reduced following incongruent versus congruent trials. Moreover, conflict adaptation effect (CAE) is thought to measure adaptive control on a trial-by-trial basis. There are two main theories explaining the mechanisms underlying CAE: conflict monitoring theory and adaptation by binding theory. However, both theories have not explicitly proposed a clear relationship between conflict strength and cognitive control adjustment. Previous studies have mostly focused on the type of conflict that triggers CAE, which reflected qualitative analysis. Hence, it remains unclear whether changes in the level of conflict of the same conflict type affect conflict adaptation. To address the above issue, the present study recruited 31 healthy participants with a mean age of 19.74 years to perform the variant of the letter flanker task without feature repetitions. Each stimulus was composed of "F/H/N/P" letter components and arranged in a way that a central target letter was flanked by symmetric arrays of two distracter letters. Experiment manipulated the level of conflict by parametrically varying the target-distracter compatibility. Flankers were 100% compatible with the central target for no-conflict condition (e.g., NNNNN), 50% for low-conflict condition (e.g., HNNNH), and 0% for high-conflict condition (e.g., HHNHH). Congruent stimuli were presented on 50% of trials with each incongruent condition occurring equally often on the remaining 50% of trials. Results showed that reaction times (RTs) increased with the number of incompatible flankers, suggesting a correlation with the level of conflict. Moreover, the interaction between previous trial congruency (no-conflict/low-conflict/high-conflict) and current trial congruency (no-conflict/low-conflict/high-conflict) was significant, which suggested that congruency of previous trials affected the interference effect of current trials. Follow-up analyses revealed that there were classic conflict adaptation phenomena between no-conflict and low-conflict, no-conflict and high-conflict, and low-conflict and high-conflict conditions. These results showed that conflict adaptation was also triggered by the level of conflict in addition to the occurrence of the conflict. Overall, the present study demonstrated that the conflict strength of previous trials was related to the cognitive control level of current trials, showing that larger conflict led to stronger cognitive control adjustment. In addition, the function of conflict-induced cognitive control may be realized by attentional focusing. In conclusion, the present study emphasizes that changes in the level of conflict could trigger conflict adaptation, which provides more direct support for attention adjustment mechanism of conflict monitoring theory. Combining existing researches, we infer that conflict monitoring is sensitive to the type and level of conflict, and adjusts the level of cognitive control to facilitate conflict resolution.

Temporal Dynamics of Conflict Adaptation Across Different Conflict Strengths.

The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation induced by conflict observation: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analysis

Changes in the level of conflict trigger conflict adaptation

The Neural Dynamics of Conflict Adaptation Within a Look-to-Do Transition

Electrophysiological Correlates Related to the Conflict Adaptation Effect in an Emotional Conflict Task.

Conflict Adaptation is Induced by the Observation of Conflict: an ERP Study

Prefrontal-posterior coupling mediates emotion transitions and their influence on executive function

Observation of conflict triggers conflict adaptation.

Adaptation in conflict: are conflict-triggered control adjustments protected in the presence of motivational distractors?

Conflict Adaptation in the Perception of Emotional Valence in A Stroop Task

Adaptive Adjustment after Conflict with Group Opinion: Evidence from Neural Electrophysiology.

Conflict Adaptation is Independent of Consciousness:Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict

Enhanced Conflict-Driven Cognitive Control by Emotional Arousal, Not by Valence

The neural network underlying individual differences in conflict adaptation effect

Conflict Adaptation is Reflected by Response Interference

Neural Oscillation Mechanisms of Conflict Adaptation

Dissociable Early Attentional Control Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive and Affective Conflicts

Functional connectivity patterns reflect individual differences in conflict adaptation.

Development of neural mechanisms in emotional conflict adaptation: A comparison of children, adolescents, and young adults.

Opposite Effect of Conflict Context Modulation on Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive and Affective Control.