Comparison of mid-term clinical results between lag screw fixation and Kirschner wire fixation after close reduction in adolescent triplane distal tibia epiphyseal fracture

Zhongwen Tang,Feng Xiang,Djandan Tadum Arthur,Sheng Xiao,Jie Wen,Hong Liu,Xin Li,Ke Fang,Ming Zeng,Shu Cao,Bo Li,Haoli Gong,Fanling Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2022.08.007
IF: 2.84
2022-01-01
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Abstract:Objective: To compare the mid-term clinical results of lag screw and Kirschner wire fixation(KWF) for close reduction in triplane distal tibia epiphyseal fracture.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 25 cases of triplane fractures of the distal tibia treated in our de-partment from Jan 2017 to Dec 2019 was performed, Lag screw fixation(LSF) was used in 14 cases and Kirschner wire fixation in 11 cases, the clinical results were evaluated by premature epiphyseal closure(PPC) rate, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot foot scoring system, the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) from X-ray. Results: All the 25 children were followed up for a mean of 34(ranging 26-52) months. AOFAS scores im-proved from a mean of 33(ranging 29-43) pre-op, to 82(ranging 77-88) at three month follow up, to 92 (ranging 88-98) at last follow-up in all 25 cases. Till last follow up there was no cases premature physeal closure in LSF group but 4 cases in KWF group, LDTA in both groups at last follow up shows no ankle varus or valgus deformity, and the ankle joint function was not limited in all cases.Conclusion: Lag screw and Kirschner wire fixation methods can both achieve good clinical effects for tri-plane distal tibia epiphyseal fracture. Lag screw fixation provide lower PPC rate but Kirschner wire fixation save one anesthesia and surgery.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Foot and Ankle Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?