Fuzzy Monotonic <italic>K</italic>-Nearest Neighbor Versus Monotonic Fuzzy <italic>K</italic>-Nearest Neighbor

hong zhu,xizhao wang(),ran wang()
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3117450
IF: 12.253
2022-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Abstract:In real-life applications, monotonic classification is a widespread task, where the improvement of a particular input value cannot result in an inferior output. A common drawback of the existing algorithms for monotonic classification is their sensitivity to noise data which particularly refer to monotonicity violations in the monotonic circumstance. Motivated by weakening the impact of noises, the fuzzy monotonic <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> -nearest neighbor (FM <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN) is proposed in this article, which constructs monotonic classifiers by taking advantage of the fuzzy dominance relation between a pair of instances, especially that between incomparable instances for the first time. Through tuning the thresholds of fuzzy dominance relation degrees, FM <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN intends to decrease the disturbance caused by noises which considerably affect the selection range of the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> -nearest neighbors in different extent. The experimental results show that the best average improvement degrees of FM <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN in terms of the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN-based and non- <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN-based classifiers on all the involved datasets arrive at 28 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\%$</tex-math></inline-formula> , 11 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\%$</tex-math></inline-formula> , and 29 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\%$</tex-math></inline-formula> with respect to ACCU, MAE, and NMI, respectively, which demonstrates the superiority of our proposed FM <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN over other state-of-the-art monotonic classifiers including the monotonic fuzzy <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> -nearest neighbor (MF <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K</i> NN) which disperses the impact of noise data by converting crisp class labels into class membership vectors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?