Mg–Fe Isotopes Link the Geochemical Complexity of the Coldwell Complex, Midcontinent Rift to Metasomatic Processes in the Mantle

Matthew J. Brzozowski,David J. Good,Weihao Yan,Changzhi Wu,Shichao An,Weiqiang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egac081

2022-01-01

Journal of Petrology

Abstract:Mafic intrusions in the Coldwell Complex have previously been interpreted as forming from a metasomatized mantle source. To build upon our understanding of this metasomatism, the Mg-Fe isotope compositions of these rocks have been determined, and variations are assessed with respect to the magmatic processes that could have occurred at different stages of their formation. The mineralized Marathon Series (delta Mg-26 = -0.28 parts per thousand to -0.19 parts per thousand), associated metabasalt (delta Mg-26 = -0.24 parts per thousand to -0.23 parts per thousand), and the Geordie Lake gabbro (delta Mg-26 = -0.31 parts per thousand to -0.22 parts per thousand) are characterized by delta Mg-26 values that are within the range of mantle values, whereas the unmineralized Layered Series (delta Mg-26 = -0.2 parts per thousand to -0.05 parts per thousand) is heavier than mantle. In contrast, the delta Fe-56 values of all the Coldwell basaltic-gabbroic rocks (delta Fe-56 = 0.07 +/- 0.08 parts per thousand) are heavier than mantle but within the range of terrestrial basalts and mafic-ultramafic layered intrusions. We propose that the Mg-Fe isotope compositions of these rocks was not significantly modified by processes such as partial melting or garnet retention/fractionation in the mantle, fractional crystallization, or contamination during ascent through the crust, as the isotope values do not correlate with proxies for these processes (e.g. La/Sm and La/Yb, Gd/Yb, MgO-CaO-TiO2, and Th/Nb and Th/La, respectively). Their isotope compositions are, therefore, proposed to reflect the compositions of their metasomatized mantle sources. We conclude that metasomatism was not caused by a carbonate melt, subduction-altered oceanic crust and sediments, or an evolved silicate melt, as these processes generate light delta Mg-26, variably fractionated delta Fe-56, and heavy delta Fe-56 values, respectively, which are not observed in our dataset for the Coldwell Complex. The agent that metasomatized the mantle beneath the Coldwell Complex was likely slab-derived fluids characterized by isotopically heavy delta Mg-26 and basaltic delta Fe-56 values. This scenario can account for the lack of Fe isotope fractionation from basaltic values in all of the Coldwell rocks. The variably heavier delta Mg-26 of the Layered Series (-0.20 +/- 0.01 parts per thousand to -0.05 +/- 0.05 parts per thousand) relative to the mantle (-0.25 +/- 0.07 parts per thousand) suggests that the magmas for the Coldwell rocks were derived by tapping of an isotopically heterogeneous mantle source that had undergone variable degrees of metasomatism. The distinctive geochemistry of mafic sequences in the Coldwell and numerous mafic dykes located in the northeast shoulder of the Midcontinent Rift suggests the presence of a variably metasomatized mantle source beneath a large area of the rift.