Abstract:The key to hyperspectral anomaly detection is to effectively distinguish anomalies from the background, especially in the case that background is complex and anomalies are weak. Hyperspectral imagery (HSI) as an image–spectrum merging cube data can be intrinsically represented as a third-order tensor that integrates spectral information and spatial information. In this article, a prior-based tensor approximation (PTA) is proposed for hyperspectral anomaly detection, in which HSI is decomposed into a background tensor and an anomaly tensor. In the background tensor, a low-rank prior is incorporated into spectral dimension by truncated nuclear norm regularization, and a piecewise-smooth prior on spatial dimension can be embedded by a linear total variation-norm regularization. For anomaly tensor, it is unfolded along spectral dimension coupled with spatial group sparse prior that can be represented by the <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="3.027ex" height="2.843ex" style="vertical-align: -1.005ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 1303.2 1223.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-6C" x="0" y="0"></use><g transform="translate(298,-150)"> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2C" x="500" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-31" x="779" y="0"></use></g></g></svg></span> -norm regularization. In the designed method, all the priors are integrated into a unified convex framework, and the anomalies can be finally determined by the anomaly tensor. Experimental results validated on several real hyperspectral data sets demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms some state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods.<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-6C" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path></defs></svg>

Tensor Approximation With Low-Rank Representation and Kurtosis Correlation Constraint for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Via Locally Enhanced Low-Rank Prior

Enhanced Tensor Low-Rank Representation Learning for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Adaptive Low-Rank Transformed Tensor

Deep Low-Rank Prior for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Robust Tensor Low-Rank Sparse Representation with Saliency Prior for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Low-Rank Representation Using Local Outlier Factor

Learning Tensor Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Local-density-based Potential Dictionary Construction for Low Rank Representation in Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Regularized Background Abundance Tensor Decomposition

Anomaly detection algorithm based on FrFT transform and total variation regularization

Locality Constrained Low Rank Representation and Automatic Dictionary Learning for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Enhance Tensor RPCA-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Exploiting the Sparse Characteristics in Probabilistic Feature Space for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection With Tensor Average Rank and Piecewise Smoothness Constraints

Iterative Graph Propagation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Local Spatial Constraint and Total Variation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Prior-Based Tensor Approximation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Low-Rank Representation and Learned Dictionary

Manifold Regularized Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection with Data Sphering and Unsupervised Target Detection.