Sedimentary Pyrites and C/S Ratios of Mud Sediments on the East China Sea Inner Shelf Indicate Late Pleistocene-Holocene Environmental Evolution

Xiting Liu,Mingyu Zhang,Anchun Li,Jiang Dong,Kaidi Zhang,Yu Gu,Xin Chang,Guangchao Zhuang,Qing Li,Houjie Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106854
IF: 3.627
2022-01-01
Marine Geology
Abstract:Sedimentary pyrite and the ratio between organic carbon and pyrite sulfur (C/S ratio) have been widely used as paleosalinity indicators to distinguish between marine and freshwater environments. However, in unsteady marine environments with strong physical reworking, the formation of pyrite is limited, leading to a high C/S ratio, as is the case in freshwater environments; thus, whether C/S ratios can identify unsteady marine environments in sedimentary strata is still a controversial topic. To calculate the availability of these classic indicators in unsteady environments, we analysed multiple indicators of core sediments obtained from the inner shelf of the East China Sea. Our results show that there are no pyrite aggregates in the sediments deposited under terrestrial conditions before 13.1 ka. During this period, the C/S ratios are higher than 2.8, representing the characteristics of sediment deposited in freshwater environments, which is also supported by low Sr/Ba ratios. When the core site was initially affected by seawater intrusion at approximately 13.1 ka, pyrite aggregates appeared for the first time, accompanied by a rapid decrease in C/S ratios, indicating a brackish tidal flat environment. We find that the C/S ratio overlaps between tidal flat and inner shelf environments, but the relatively high content of pyrite aggregates and fine-grained sediments in the shelf sediments can effectively separate these two environments. Our results further reveal that the mud depocentre initially developed at approximately 7.5 ka when the sea level reached its highstand. These new findings suggest that geochemical indicators should always be used in conjunction with sedimentary and paleoecological evidence to prevent biased conclusions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?