Nickel Bioaccessibility in Soils with High Geochemical Background and Anthropogenic Contamination.

Song Ding,Dong-Xing Guan,Zhi-Hua Dai,Jing Su,H. Henry Teng,Junfeng Ji,Yizhang Liu,Zhongfang Yang,Lena Q. Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119914
IF: 8.9
2022-01-01
Environmental Pollution
Abstract:Abnormally high concentrations of metals including nickel (Ni) in soils result from high geochemical background (HB) or anthropogenic contamination (AC). Metal bioaccessibility in AC-soils has been extensively explored, but studies in HB-soils are limited. This study examined the Ni bioaccessibility in basalt and black shale derived HB-soils, with AC-soils and soils without contamination (CT) being used for comparison. Although HB-and AC-soils had similar Ni levels (123 & PLUSMN; 43.0 vs 155 & PLUSMN; 84.7 mg kg-1), their Ni bioaccessibility based on the gastric phase of the Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium (SBRC) in vitro assay was different. Nickel bioaccessibility in HB-soils was 6.42 & PLUSMN; 3.78%, 2-times lower than the CT-soils (12.0 & PLUSMN; 9.71%) and 6-times lower than that in AC -soils (42.6 +/- 16.3%). Based on the sequential extraction, a much higher residual Ni fractionation in HB-soils than that in CT-and AC-soils was observed (81.9 & PLUSMN; 9.52% vs 68.6 & PLUSMN; 9.46% and 38.7 & PLUSMN; 16.0%). Further, correlation analysis indicate that the available Ni (exchangeable + carbonate-bound + Fe/Mn hydroxide-bound) was highly correlated with Ni bioaccessibility, which was also related to the organic carbon content in soils. The difference in co-localization between Ni and other elements (Fe, Mn and Ca) from high-resolution NanoSIMS analysis provided additional explanation for Ni bioaccessibility. In short, based on the large difference in Ni bio-accessibility in geochemical background and anthropogenic contaminated soils, it is important to base contamination sources for proper risk assessment of Ni-contaminated soils.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?