The West China Hospital Radiographic Classification for Fibrous Dysplasia in Femur and Adjacent Bones: A Retrospective Analysis of 205 Patients.

Yitian Wang,Yi Luo,Li Min,Yong Zhou,Jie Wang,Yuqi Zhang,Minxun Lu,Hong Duan,Chongqi Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13404
2022-01-01
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Objective This study aims to investigate the reliability and clinical outcome of a newly developed classification system for patients with fibrous dysplasia (FD) of the femur and adjacent bones, optimizing its evaluation and management. Methods A total of 205 patients (121 female and 84 male) with FD in the femur and adjacent bones were included in this retrospective study. All affected femurs were measured and treated based on this classification at our institution between 2009 and 2019. Based on previous studies and extensive clinical follow‐up, we cautiously proposed the West China Hospital radiographic classification for FD in femur and adjacent bones following corresponding treatment options. There are five types with five radiographic features, including proximal femur bone loss, coxa vara, femoral shaft deformity, genu valgum, and hip arthritis. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of this classification was assessed by four observers using the Cohen kappa statistic. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the criteria of Guille. Results At a median follow‐up of 60 months (range 6–120), 205 patients (median 34.8 years old, range 18–73 years old) were categorized into the following five types: Type I 31.7%, Type II 30.2%, Type III 20.5%, Type IV 10.2%, and Type V 7.3%. The mean interobserver and intraobserver kappa scores were 0.85 (range 0.77–0.89) and 0.85 (range 0.79–0.92), respectively. For clinical outcomes, there was no significant difference in the postoperative Guille score for Type I patients (mean 9.01 ± 1.22). There was a significant increase in the postoperative Guille score in Type II, III, IV, and V, compared to the preoperative values (P < 0.01). For complications, two Type III patients reported pain, and one Type III patient had mild‐to‐moderate Trendelenburg gait. One Type IV patient had a mild Trendelenburg gait. And two Type V patients still had mild limping. Conclusion This classification is reproducible and serves as a tool for evaluating and treating FD in the femur and adjacent bones. Therefore, we recommend this classification for the diagnosis and treatment of FD‐related deformities in the femur and adjacent bones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?