Abstract:With the expansion of the internet, a major threat has emerged involving the spread of malicious domains intended by attackers to perform illegal activities aiming to target governments, violating privacy of organizations, and even manipulating everyday users. Therefore, detecting these harmful domains is necessary to combat the growing network attacks. Machine Learning (ML) models have shown significant outcomes towards the detection of malicious domains. However, the "black box" nature of the complex ML models obstructs their wide-ranging acceptance in some of the fields. The emergence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has successfully incorporated the interpretability and explicability in the complex models. Furthermore, the post hoc XAI model has enabled the interpretability without affecting the performance of the models. This study aimed to propose an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) model to detect malicious domains on a recent dataset containing 45,000 samples of malicious and non-malicious domains. In the current study, initially several interpretable ML models, such as Decision Tree (DT) and Naïve Bayes (NB), and black box ensemble models, such as Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), AdaBoost (AB), and Cat Boost (CB) algorithms, were implemented and found that XGB outperformed the other classifiers. Furthermore, the post hoc XAI global surrogate model (Shapley additive explanations) and local surrogate LIME were used to generate the explanation of the XGB prediction. Two sets of experiments were performed; initially the model was executed using a preprocessed dataset and later with selected features using the Sequential Forward Feature selection algorithm. The results demonstrate that ML algorithms were able to distinguish benign and malicious domains with overall accuracy ranging from 0.8479 to 0.9856. The ensemble classifier XGB achieved the highest result, with an AUC and accuracy of 0.9991 and 0.9856, respectively, before the feature selection algorithm, while there was an AUC of 0.999 and accuracy of 0.9818 after the feature selection algorithm. The proposed model outperformed the benchmark study.

Explainability in AI-based Behavioral Malware Detection Systems

A Comprehensive Analysis of Explainable AI for Malware Hunting

Explainable Malware Analysis: Concepts, Approaches and Challenges

Explainable AI for Android Malware Detection: Towards Understanding Why the Models Perform So Well?

XAI and Android Malware Models

Explainable AI for Intrusion Detection Systems: LIME and SHAP Applicability on Multi-Layer Perceptron

A deep learning anomaly detection framework with explainability and robustness

The Revolution and Vision of Explainable AI for Android Malware Detection and Protection

SoK: Explainable Machine Learning for Computer Security Applications

Explaining Network Intrusion Detection System Using Explainable AI Framework

Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Malicious Domains Detection Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Learning Explainable Representations of Malware Behavior

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research

More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI into a Cyber-AI Tool

Explainable Deep Learning Models for Dynamic and Online Malware Classification

E-XAI: Evaluating Black-Box Explainable AI Frameworks for Network Intrusion Detection

EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)—From Theory to Methods and Applications

Improving IoT Security With Explainable AI: Quantitative Evaluation of Explainability for IoT Botnet Detection

Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities

Interpreting Machine Learning Malware Detectors Which Leverage N-gram Analysis

Can We Trust Your Explanations? Sanity Checks for Interpreters in Android Malware Analysis.