Abstract:Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a mechanical blockage that clinically progresses based on the degree of obstruction. Patients often experience debilitating symptoms with intractable nausea, vomiting, and limited peroral intake that can quickly lead to malnutrition, decreased quality of life, and potential delays in chemotherapy [1]. While surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE) has been the mainstay of treatment with long-term palliation, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that may delay treatment in the postoperative period [2]. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as an effective minimally invasive alternative for suboptimal operative candidates [1]. Comparing these techniques is paramount, especially as increased operator experience with EUS-GE expands and advancements in chemotherapy treatment extends the life expectancy in this patient population. In a recent issue of Endoscopy International Open, Jaruvongvanich et al [3] compare the outcomes of patients undergoing EUS-GE, enteral stenting (ES), or SGE for benign and malignant etiologies of GOO. This was a dual-center retrospective study of 436 patients with a median follow up of 185.5 days, of which 233 were in the EUS-GE cohort. Baseline characteristics between EUS-GE and SGE were largely similar, although the EUS-GE group had higher rates of ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis, ECOG status, a malignant indication, and symptomatic GOO. The technical success rate was similar in all groups. However, the clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-GE group compared to ES and SGE (98.3% vs 91.6% vs 90.4%, P = 0.002) with lower rates of reintervention (0.9% vs 12.2% vs 13.7%, P < 0.0001) and median length of stay (LOS) (2 vs 3 vs 5 days, P < 0.0001). A subgroup analysis examining the 360 patients with malignant GOO demonstrated similar findings. There were also lower rates of adverse events in the EUS-GE group (8.6%) compared to SGE (27.4%) and ES (38.9%). There were limited instances of stent obstruction, migration, and inadequate stent expansion after EUS-GE. The long-term outcomes of EUS-GE appear to be reliable, especially in a sicker patient population, as was the case in this cohort. This is a well-designed study that advances the current literature supporting the efficacy and durability of EUS-GE, particularly in sick patients. Yet, before these data can alter practice management, one must consider that this study did not differentiate surgical approaches (open and laparoscopic) in their outcomes. Laparoscopic SGE is now the preferred method because it is associated with improved outcomes, decreased LOS, and shorter time to resumption of oral intake [4]. Analyzing outcomes should ideally be done in this context, although such a comparison is limited in a retrospective study. Patients who undergo conversion from laparoscopic to open approaches will likely have fundamentally different outcomes than those whose procedures can be completed laparoscopically. There is selection bias and heterogeneity in all studies to date pertaining to EUS-GE versus SGE. Patients undergoing EUS-GE are generally sicker with more advanced cancers and comorbidities [5]. A more focused comparison between laparoscopic SGE and EUS-GE, therefore, may either blunt or further cement the advantages of a purely endoscopic approach. Prospective studies comparing these techniques are needed as we continue to define the optimal role of EUS-GE for GOO. Article published online: 09 June 2023 © 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Different Sites: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

The safety and efficacy of <scp>EUS‐GE</scp> for gastric outlet obstruction in different sites: a single‐center retrospective study

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy Using Double Balloon Occlusion Methods: a Clinical Retrospective Study in 36 Patients with Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Application of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in treatment of gastric outlet obstruction

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Big End Double-Layer Stents for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Stomach Cancer

Endoscopic ultrasound guided gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction: multi-centre experience from the United Kingdom

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to acute pancreatitis

Clinical Review of EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE)

EUS Gastroenterostomy: Primetime for All?

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy for benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO): a retrospective analysis of patients and outcomes

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus open surgical gastrojejunostomy: clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness analysis

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction

EUS-guided Gastrojejunostomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy: An International Collaborative Study

Nasojejunal tube-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction is safe and effective

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy versus Enteral Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study

Surgical versus endoscopic gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective multicentric comparative study of technical and clinical success