Abstract:This paper develops new insights into quantitative methods for the validation of computational model prediction. Four types of methods are investigated, namely classical and Bayesian hypothesis testing, a reliability-based method, and an area metric-based method. Traditional Bayesian hypothesis testing is extended based on interval hypotheses on distribution parameters and equality hypotheses on probability distributions, in order to validate models with deterministic/stochastic output for given inputs. Formulations and implementation details are outlined for both equality and interval hypotheses. Two types of validation experiments are considered—fully characterized (all the model/experimental inputs are measured and reported as point values) and partially characterized (some of the model/experimental inputs are not measured or are reported as intervals). Bayesian hypothesis testing can minimize the risk in model selection by properly choosing the model acceptance threshold, and its results can be used in model averaging to avoid Type I /II errors. It is shown that Bayesian interval hypothesis testing, the reliability-based method, and the area metric-based method can account for the existence of directional bias, where the mean predictions of a numerical model may be consistently below or above the corresponding experimental observations. It is also found that under some specific conditions, the Bayes factor metric in Bayesian equality hypothesis testing and the reliability-based metric can both be mathematically related to the p-value metric in classical hypothesis testing. Numerical studies are conducted to apply the above validation methods to gas damping prediction for radio frequency (RF) micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) switches. The model of interest is a general polynomial chaos (gPC) surrogate model constructed based on expensive runs of a physics-based simulation model, and validation data are collected from fully characterized experiments.

A general model validation and testing tool

A Generalized Bayesian Approach to Model Calibration

Toward a Better Understanding of Model Validation Metrics

Bayesian Validation Assessment of Multivariate Computational Models

A New Validation Metric for Models with Correlated Responses Using Limited Experimental and Simulation Data

Bayesian Inference Method for Model Validation and Confidence Extrapolation

Development and Realization of Validation Benchmarks

Bayesian risk-based decision method for model validation under uncertainty

An Investigation of Bayesian Inference Approach to Model Validation with Non-Normal Data

Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights

A New Interval Area Metric for Model Validation with Limited Experimental Data

Model Validation Via Uncertainty Propagation and Data Transformations

A Validation Metric for Model with Mixture of Random and Interval Variables

Knowledge-based model validation using a custom metric

Model Validation of Dynamic Engineering Models under Uncertainty

Non-probabilistic Bayesian Update Method for Model Validation

How to validate a Bayesian evolutionary model

Validation Metric Based on Mahalanobis Distance for Models with Multiple Correlated Responses.

New validation metrics for models with multiple correlated responses

Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Method for Hierarchical Model Validation