Impact of Subintimal Plaque Modification on Reattempted Chronic Total Occlusions Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Xin Zhong,Wei Gao,Tao Hu,Jiahui Chen,Xianglin Tang,Shixuan Huang,Tingwen Gao,Yuanji Ma,Ruochen Wang,You Zhou,Hua Li,Hao Lu,Shufu Chang,Dong Huang,Jianying Ma,Juying Qian,Lei Ge,Junbo Ge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.015
2022-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND Predictors of success in reattempted chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures remain obscure, mainly owing to the lack of consecutive angiograms and procedural records of initial attempts in the same cohort. OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the factors predicting the success of reattempted CTO PCI procedures. METHODS A total of 208 consecutive patients who underwent a failed CTO PCI attempt and received reattempted procedure at the same cardiac center were retrospectively analyzed. Predictors of the success of reattempted procedures were evaluated. RESULTS The overall technical success rate of reattempted CTO PCI procedures was 71.2%. Subintimal plaque modi-fication (SPM) was implemented in 35 (16.8%) procedures in initial attempts. The reattempted technical success rate was 93.3% in cases in which SPM with guidewire (GW) crossing was achieved in the initial attempt; however, the success rate was 55.0% for procedures involving SPM without GW crossing. SPM with GW crossing (OR: 11.21; 95% CI: 1.31-96.16; P = 0.028), referral to high-volume operators (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.14-4.98; P = 0.021), and a bidirectional approach (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.12-4.79; P = 0.024) were positive independent predictors of technical success in the subsequent reattempt. The time interval for reattempt (per 90-day increment) was negatively correlated with the technical success of the reattempted procedures (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS This study identified independent predictors of success in reattempted CTO PCI procedures. SPM with GW crossing achieved in the initial attempt is associated with a higher success rate in the subsequent reattempt. (C) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?