Priority Between Academic Performance and Health when Chinese Adults Decide on Children's Outdoor Activity

Hui Xie,Dandan Wang,Tong Ge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16125

2022-01-01

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Abstract:Evidence suggests that increased duration of outdoor activities (OAs) can reduce the risks of developing adverse health conditions in children.1 However, the frequency of doing OAs in children is reported to be low and on a declining trend globally.2 Among factors shaping the low frequency of doing OAs,3 the academic performance of children stands out in Chinese settings. Children are generally not encouraged to do OAs as most Chinese guardians hold the view that doing OAs imposes a negative impact on academic performance by reducing time spent on learning. When looking at how to promote OAs in children, the perceived benefits and harms in guardians may come into play. Particularly, how adults, including guardians and non-guardians, weigh the impacts OAs impose on academic performance and health is important for health education aimed at children. Using a discrete choice experiment survey incorporating 24 choice tasks with each consisting of five systematically different child attributes (sex, grade, myopia, general health and academic performance; Table 1),4 we investigated the perceived priority among Chinese adults (18 years and older) between academic performance and health whey they decide on children's OAs. We randomly presented eight choice tasks to each participant and asked ‘if you had a kid and your kid had the given attributes, will you encourage him/her to do OAs?’ An online convenience sample of 211 participants (1688 observations) was finally included in the analysis. Bayesian logistic regression models were used to explore the relative importance of the attributes.5 Our sample consisted of more participants who were women (78.20%), young (18–30 years, 54.50%), and child guardians (61.14%). Table 1 showed that ‘Academic performance’ was the most dominant attribute, followed by ‘health’, ‘myopia’, ‘sex’ and ‘grade’. Looking further at attribute levels, compared with the attribute level ‘top 5% of academic performance’, ‘bottom 50%’ was significantly associated with higher absolute weight in the decision process; compared with the attribute level ‘bad health’, ‘average’ and ‘good’ were significantly associated with higher absolute weight. Subgroup analysis showed that the priority ranking was consistently observed in subgroups of guardians and non-guardians. Our study suggests that the perceived negative impact of OAs on children's academic performance is considered more than the positive impact on children's health when Chinese guardians and non-guardians make decisions on whether or not to encourage children to do OAs. Other designed attributes, including sex, grade and myopia status, seemed to be indifferent in the decision process.