Abstract:Virtual humans are digital characters created in computer graphics software that take a first-person view of the world and have a social media presence. Compared with real humans, however, are people likely to attribute moral responsibility differently to virtual humans when they do something morally wrong? This important empirical question remains unanswered. Therefore, we addressed this query using Mental Perception Theory. We did so through exploring the influence and mechanism of cultural differences between China and the West on individuals' moral responsibility judgments of virtual humans versus real humans. Findings revealed that, when virtual humans engaged in immoral behaviors-irrespective of whether real humans or artificial intelligence (AI) controlled them-people in China (vs. the West) attributed more moral responsibility to virtual humans but equal moral responsibility to real humans. Perceived mental capacity, especially perceived experience, mediated the interaction effect of culture. Furthermore, compared to Westerners, Chinese people were more likely to punish virtual (vs. real) humans, such as by no longer following their social accounts. Five experiments revealed the foregoing findings. Study 1a and 1b used a 2 (blogger: human vs. virtual) x 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. Two hundred Chinese and 200 American Caucasian participants were recruited in Study 1a. They first read the profile of a virtual/human blogger, Rico, on Weibo (i.e., China)/Twitter (i.e., America). Next, they were told that Rico had exposed the private behavior of a netizen, which made that individual suffer from cyber violence. After that, participants rated the moral responsibility of Rico with two items. Consistent with our prediction, there was a significant interaction effect between the Chinese/Western culture and the virtual/human blogger on moral responsibility judgments. Specifically, Chinese (vs. Western) people attributed more moral responsibility to the virtual blogger, but there was no significant difference in moral responsibility judgments toward the human blogger. In Study 1b, we recruited 200 Chinese and 199 British Caucasian participants online. We utilized a similar study design and manipulations to those employed in Study 1a. Study 1b replicated the results of Study 1 with a new scenario (i.e., tax evasion) and new methods of measuring moral responsibility judgments. Study 1c used a 3 ( blogger: human s. virtual-human vs. virtual-AI) x 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. Three hundred Chinese and 300 British Caucasian participants were recruited online. The results showed that Chinese (vs. British) people attributed greater human-like moral responsibility to a virtual human controlled by real humans as well as by artificial intelligence. Study 2 used the same study design as employed in 1b. Two hundred Chinese and 199 American Caucasian participants were recruited online. They read the same profile of the virtual/human blogger Rico and his immoral behavior (i.e., tax evasion). Then, participants rated moral responsibility judgments and mental capacity of Rico. Results revealed the mediating role of perceived mental capacity (i.e., experience, not agency) on the cultural difference of moral responsibility judgments and ruled out two possible alternative explanations. Study 3 used a 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. One hundred Chinese participants and 101 American Caucasian participants were recruited online. This study utilized another scenario (i. e., plagiarism) and replicated the results of the four previous studies. Furthermore, we showed the downstream effect that Chinese (vs. American) people believed that the virtual human should be punished more (i.e., fining, suspending the account, and no longer following the account). In summary, based on Mental Perception Theory, this paper provided evidence for the cultural differences between Chinese people and Westerners on moral responsibility judgments of virtual humans. Perceived mental capacity (i.e., experience, not agency) mediated this interaction effect. In addition, we revealed the downstream results of moral punishment and contributed to literature on cultural differences and the theory about moral judgments on non-human entities.

The Hierarchies of Good and Evil Personality Traits

Good and Evil in Chinese Culture: Personality Structure and Connotation

The factor structure of Chinese personality terms.

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Moral Perfectionism and Moral Values, Virtues, and Judgments: Further Investigations

Good Personality and Moral Need Satisfaction:A Cross-Lagged Study

A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages

The Influence of Cultural Differences Between China and the West on Moral Responsibility Judgments of Virtual Humans

Development and validation of the good and evil character traits (GECT) scale

Prbm_a_226722 257..266

Description of Personality Traits by Chinese Adjectives: A Trial on University Students

The Characteristics of Moral Judgment of Psychopaths: The Mediating Effect of the Deontological Tendency.

Differences in the View of Human Nature between Eastern and Western Cultures and Its Influence on Moral Cognition

Moral bias toward different social classes

Being good to look good: Self‐reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation‐seeking individuals

The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Moral Development During Adolescence

A Preliminary Study on the Characteristics of Undergraduates' Moral Personality

Xunzi's Theory「Evil Nature」——A Comparative Study of Contemporary Hong Kong and Taiwan

Social Elite in Imperial China: Their Destinies As Documented by the Historical Literature and Their Personality As Defined by the Contemporary Five-Factor Model

Are We Born Good or Evil?——Two Experiments Concerning Children's Moral Development

Traits Across the Personality Hierarchy Differentially Relate to Positive and Negative Affect: Evidence for the Predictive Validity of Empirically Derived Meta-Traits