Abstract:While patent subsidy policy ushers in a new era for patent applications,it is also being blamed for ″inducing junk patents.″ A review of the policy's operation over the last several years highlights the reasons for attributing questionable patents to the policy.First,patent subsidy policy is not in alignment with the patent system in China.It ignores the shortcomings of China's preliminary examination system and subsidizing utility models and designs without substantive examination.Next,patent subsidy policy lacks a screening system for examining patentability.A generalized subsidy without quality control inevitably leads to junk patents.Finally,the patent subsidy amount is not properly specified.The appealing profit margin distorts the original intention of patentees and lures speculators to abuse the system by using patent applications as a means to turn a quick profit. Patent subsidy policy can get out of the predicament through two routes.The first is to learn from the practices of other countries that restrict the exercise of unstable patent rights with search reports and require a patent evaluation report as a part of the subsidy application.The ″official patent quality certification″ by China's State Intellectual Property Office featuring more thorough examinations can effectively curb questionable patent applications and squeeze out the bubbles in patent applications and grants.The second is to employ the science and technology search system,and use it so that it is the only way to subsidy application.Through systematic,objective and accurate literature searches and informatics evaluation,the science and technology novelty search provides an evaluation foundation for patent subsidy and rejects low value patents from accessing patent subsidies,thus effectively uprooting ill-intentioned subsidy applications. Regarding the procedural design,the relevant supporting systems need to be more detailed.First,patent subsidy application materials must be increased.Subsidy applicants should be required to submit patent evaluation reports or science and technology novelty search reports,as well as the corresponding payment vouchers,so that subsidy examination bodies can evaluate the authenticity and patentability.Second,the duration of patent subsidy application needs to be extended.The time required for patent evaluation reports and science and technology novelty search reports should be included within this process.Third,the patent subsidy amount should be substantially increased.Not only should the costs of patent evaluation report searches and science and technology novelty search be included,but the subsidy for valuable,quality patents should be significantly increased so as to attract valuable technological solutions to the patent application procedure. By implementing the patent subsidy policy,the government intervenes in science and technology with administrative subsidies,which,together with market regulation,serves as a structural incentive.However,the superficially prosperous patent landscape has deviated from its main purpose of advancing science and technology through incentive regulation.Therefore,it is not only imperative,but urgent that an examination of the problems of the current patent subsidy method be carried out.This paper focuses on optimizing incentive mechanisms,with the aim to integrate science and technology resources,increase incentive efficiency,and overcome the patent regulation failure.With patent value as the evaluation benchmark,a sound strategy for patent subsidy policy is to limit subsidy coverage and subsidize quality patents.Through such reforms,government regulation on patents can be put back on the right track so that the government can facilitate the development of science and technology and increase economic strength.

Today’s Baton and Tomorrow’s Vision: the Effect of Strengthening Patent Examination System on Corporate Innovation Strategies

On the Cause of the Patent Explosion-Based on the Study of Patent System

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

The Impact of Technology Identification Policy on Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence from the Second Amendment to China’s Patent Law

(When) Do Stronger Patents Increase Continual Innovation?

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Firm Patenting, Innovations, And Government Institutional Support As A Double-Edged Sword

Invention or Incremental Improvement? Simulation Modeling and Empirical Testing of Firm Patenting Behavior under Performance Aspiration

PATENTABILITY, R&D DIRECTION, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION

The impact of patent infringement litigation decisions on firms' innovation performance in China

Innovation under debtor-friendly institutional policy: Strategic patenting perspective of Chinese listed firms

Invention or Incremental Improvement?

Intellectual Property Protection, Financial Innovation and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Consummating Patent Policy and Promoting Enterprise's Innovation

Institutional Regime Shift in Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation Strategies of Firms in China

Cracking down on the infringement and counterfeiting: Intellectual property rights and corporate innovation in China

Intellectual property judicial protection, innovation factor input, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of intellectual property courts in China

Patent collateral and the trajectory of innovation

Patent Subsidy Policy: Predicaments and Outline for Reform