Characterizing the Through-Wall Sensing Mechanism of Wi-Fi Signals with a Refraction-Aware Fresnel Zone Model
Zhihui Ren,Zhu Wang,Zhuo Sun,Yifan Guo,Wenchao Song,Hualei Zhang,Chao Chen,Bin Guo,Zhiwen Yu,Xingshe Zho,Daqing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2024.3425847
IF: 6.075
2024-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Abstract:During the last decade, there have been lots of efforts on wireless sensing using Wi-Fi signals, which can be divided into two categories, i.e., the pattern-based approach and the model-based approach. Recently, more and more attention has been paid on the model-based approach, mainly due to its superiority of no need for collecting a large dataset or retraining the model for new environments. However, existing models are mainly designed for line-of-sight (LoS) scenarios, which are not applicable to non-line-of-sight (NLoS) scenarios, such as through-wall sensing. To bridge this gap, we put forward a through-wall wireless sensing model to reveal the sensing mechanism of Wi-Fi signals in NLoS scenarios. In particular, a refraction-aware Fresnel zone model is developed by taking into account both the reflection propagation and the refraction propagation of Wi-Fi signals. For the first time, we discover that the geometric distribution of Fresnel zones becomes uneven, due to the difference in dielectric constants between the air and the wall. Specifically, some areas become denser and other areas become sparser, leading to the squeeze effect and stretch effect of Fresnel zones. Inspired by the insight, we further put forward a new metric named compression-ratio to quantify the through-wall sensing capability of Wi-Fi signals. Meanwhile, a set of algorithms are developed to guide the deployment of Wi-Fi sensing systems. To validate the proposed model, we implement a through-wall respiration sensing prototype system. Experiments show that the respiration detection performance varies significantly when the user locates in different areas. Specifically, for two sensing locations (one in the compression area and the other in the expansion area) symmetrically distributed on both sides of the transceivers' connection line, the difference in mean absolute errors (MAE) can exceed 3 times.