Major source categories of PM 2.5 oxidative potential in wintertime Beijing and surroundings based on online dithiothreitol-based field measurements
Rico K Y Cheung,Lu Qi,Manousos I Manousakas,Joseph V Puthussery,Yan Zheng,Theodore K Koenig,Tianqu Cui,Tiantian Wang,Yanli Ge,Gaoyuan Wei,Yu Kuang,Mengshuang Sheng,Zhen Cheng,Ailin Li,Zhiyu Li,Weikang Ran,Weiqi Xu,Renjian Zhang,Yuemei Han,Qiyuan Wang,Zifa Wang,Yele Sun,Junji Cao,Jay G Slowik,Kaspar R Dällenbach,Vishal Verma,Martin Gysel-Beer,Xinghua Qiu,Qi Chen,Jing Shang,Imad El-Haddad,André S H Prévôt,Robin L Modini,Rico K.Y. Cheung,Manousos I. Manousakas,Joseph V. Puthussery,Theodore K. Koenig,Jay G. Slowik,Kaspar R. Dällenbach,André S.H. Prévôt,Robin L. Modini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172345
IF: 9.8
2024-04-20
The Science of The Total Environment
Abstract:Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) causes millions of premature deaths each year worldwide. Oxidative potential (OP) has been proposed as a better metric for aerosol health effects than PM 2.5 mass concentration alone. In this study, we report for the first time online measurements of PM 2.5 OP in wintertime Beijing and surroundings based on a dithiothreitol (DTT) assay. These measurements were combined with co-located PM chemical composition measurements to identify the main source categories of aerosol OP. In addition, we highlight the influence of two distinct pollution events on aerosol OP (spring festival celebrations including fireworks and a severe regional dust storm). Source apportionment coupled with multilinear regression revealed that primary PM and oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA) were both important sources of OP, accounting for 41 ± 12 % and 39 ± 10 % of the OP v DTT (OP normalized by the sampled air volume), respectively. The small remainder was attributed to fireworks and dust, mainly resulting from the two distinct pollution events. During the 3.5-day spring festival period, OP v DTT spiked to 4.9 nmol min −1 m −3 with slightly more contribution from OOA (42 ± 11 %) and less from primary PM (31 ± 15 %). During the dust storm, hourly-averaged PM 2.5 peaked at a very high value of 548 μg m −3 due to the dominant presence of dust-laden particles (88 % of total PM 2.5 ). In contrast, only mildly elevated OP v DTT values (up to 1.5 nmol min −1 m −3 ) were observed during this dust event. This observation indicates that variations in OP v DTT cannot be fully explained using PM 2.5 alone; one must also consider the chemical composition of PM 2.5 when studying aerosol health effects. Our study highlights the need for continued pollution control strategies to reduce primary PM emissions, and more in-depth investigations into the source origins of OOA, to minimize the health risks associated with PM exposure in Beijing.
environmental sciences