Abstract:Background and aims: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently. Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements. Results: Statement 1: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Statement 2: Computer vision-based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing-based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. Statement 3: AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. Statement 4: Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. Statement 5: Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. Statement 6: Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. Statement 7: Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human-AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. Statement 8: For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. Statement 9: Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. Statement 10: A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology. Conclusions: The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

Weo international consensus on endoscopy technique: development of a standard operating procedure for egd using design thinking

International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption

The Use of Fluoroscopy for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

An Asian consensus on standards of diagnostic upper endoscopy for neoplasia

Do patients actually understand? An evaluation of the informed consent process for endoscopic procedures in rural Uganda

Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound

Gel immersion endoscopy: Innovation in securing the visual field – Clinical experience with 265 consecutive procedures

Sustainability of Single-Use Endoscopes

IMPACT OF DOUBLE-BOOKING COLONOSCOPIES ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATE

Potential for expanded application of endoscopic hand suturing: A pilot study of 15 cases

Endoscope design for the future

Cutting-Edge Technologies for Gastrointestinal Therapeutic Endoscopy

Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology

OUTCOMES OF A SECOND SCREENING COLONOSCOPY AFTER A NORMAL INDEX COLONOSCOPY IN A PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN AND HISPANIC COMMUNITY

Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Hand Suturing in Various Applications

Benefits and Challenges in Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: World Endoscopy Organization Position Statement

DESIRABLE TRAINING AND ROLES OF JAPANESE ENDOSCOPISTS TOWARDS THE FURTHER PENETRATION OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IN ASIA

Consensus statements on endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition. Guidelines from the Asian Endoscopic Ultrasound Group

The Awareness and Experience About Endoscopic Adverse Events Among South Korean Endoscopists

The Evolution of Spinal Endoscopy: Design and Image Analysis of a Single-Use Digital Endoscope Versus Traditional Optic Endoscope