Abstract:We show that electron pairing is indispensable for the development of the leading edge gap as observed in ARPES measurement in the underdoped cuprates, even though clear evidence for the violation of the particle-hole symmetry is found in the electron spectrum. To support this assertion, we studied the electron spectrum under the scattering of diffusive antiferromagnetic(AF) spin fluctuation, which is thought to be a major candidate for a competing order in the competing order scenario of the pseudogap phenomena. We find that the Fermi level crossing along the M=(π,0) to X=(π,π) line can only be avoided when the M point is pushed above the Fermi level in this scenario. We argue that the same conclusion holds in all competing order scenarios that preserve the U(1) charge conservation. The inconsistency between this prediction and the ARPES observation implies that a competing order in the particle-hole channel alone is not sufficient to explain the pseudogap as observed in ARPES measurement. We also find that the electron system always forms a single large Fermi surface under the scattering of short-ranged dynamical spin fluctuation, rather than forming small Fermi pockets as predicted by the AF band folding picture. The AF shadow band is smeared out in energy as a result of the dispersion in the scattered quasiparticle state and the diffusion in spin fluctuation energy. Nevertheless, we find that the AF band folding effect is important for the understanding of the quasiparticle dynamics in the pseudogap phase, especially, of the origin of the high energy hump structure in the anti-nodal region and the signature of particle-hole asymmetry in the electron spectrum.

Electronic nature of the pseudogap in electron-doped Sr 2 IrO 4

Fermi surface and pseudogap in highly doped Sr$_{2}$IrO$_{4}$

Pseudogap in electron-doped cuprates: Strong correlation leading to band splitting

Spectroscopic evidence for electron-boson coupling in electron-doped Sr$_2$IrO$_4$

Spectroscopic Evidence for Electron-Boson Coupling in Electron-Doped Sr_2IrO_4

Pseudogap-induced anisotropic suppression of electronic Raman response in cuprate superconductors

Mechanism of pseudogap detected by electronic raman scattering: Phase fluctuation or hidden order?

Anomalous Spectral Broadening and Symmetry Breaking in the Pseudogap State of Bi2201

Pseusogap in Cuprates by Electronic Raman Scattering

Nematicity in the pseudogap state of cuprate superconductors revealed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Particle-Hole Asymmetry in the Cuprate Pseudogap Measured with Time-Resolved Spectroscopy

Anomalous Electronic Structure and Pseudogap Effects Innd1.85ce0.15cuo4

Conservation of the Particle-Hole Symmetry in the Pseudogap State in Optimally-Doped Bi<sub>2</sub>Sr<sub>2</sub>CuO<sub>6+<i>δ</i> </sub> Superconductor

Effect Of The Pseudogap On The Infrared Response In Cuprate Superconductors

Electron-Doped Sr2iro4: an Analogue of Hole-Doped Cuprate Superconductors Demonstrated by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Two Pseudogaps with Different Energy Scales at the Antinode of the High-Temperature Bi2sr2cuo6 Superconductor Using Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

Pairing origin of the pseudogap as observed in ARPES measurement in the underdoped cuprates

Origin of the Pseudogap and Its Influence on Superconducting State

Pseudogap and Superconducting Fluctuations in High-Tc Cuprates

Pseudogap phase of high-Tc compounds described within the LDA+DMFT+Sigma approach

Possible Superconductivity in Sr2IrO4 Probed by Quasiparticle Interference