Abstract:Because use of high-resolution hydrologic models is becoming more widespread and estimates are made over large domains, there is a pressing need for systematic evaluation of their performance. Most evaluation efforts to date have focused on smaller basins that have been relatively undisturbed by human activity, but there is also a need to benchmark model performance more comprehensively, including basins impacted by human activities. This study benchmarks the long-term performance of two process-oriented, high-resolution, continental-scale hydrologic models that have been developed to assess water availability and risks in the United States (US): the National Water Model v2.1 application of WRF-Hydro (NWMv2.1) and the National Hydrologic Model v1.0 application of the Precipitation–Runoff Modeling System (NHMv1.0). The evaluation is performed on 5390 streamflow gages from 1983 to 2016 ( ∼ 33 years) at a daily time step, including both natural and human-impacted catchments, representing one of the most comprehensive evaluations over the contiguous US. Using the Kling–Gupta efficiency as the main evaluation metric, the models are compared against a climatological benchmark that accounts for seasonality. Overall, the model applications show similar performance, with better performance in minimally disturbed basins than in those impacted by human activities. Relative regional differences are also similar: the best performance is found in the Northeast, followed by the Southeast, and generally worse performance is found in the Central and West areas. For both models, about 80 % of the sites exceed the seasonal climatological benchmark. Basins that do not exceed the climatological benchmark are further scrutinized to provide model diagnostics for each application. Using the underperforming subset, both models tend to overestimate streamflow volumes in the West, which could be attributed to not accounting for human activities, such as active management. Both models underestimate flow variability, especially the highest flows; this was more pronounced for NHMv1.0. Low flows tended to be overestimated by NWMv2.1, whereas there were both over and underestimations for NHMv1.0, but they were less severe. Although this study focused on model diagnostics for underperforming sites based on the seasonal climatological benchmark, metrics for all sites for both model applications are openly available online.

Improving performance of bucket-type hydrological models in high latitudes with multi-model combination methods: Can we wring water from a stone?

Merging Multi-Source Precipitation Products or Merging Their Simulated Hydrological Flows to Improve Streamflow Simulation

Evaluating the Performance of Hydrological Models with Joint Multifractal Spectra

Improving Hydrological Model Simulations with Combined Multi-Input and Multimodel Averaging Frameworks

How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling

Improving the simulations of the hydrological model in the karst catchment by integrating the conceptual model with machine learning models

Benefit of Multivariate Model Calibration for Different Climatic Regions

Performance evaluation of CMIP6 models for application to hydrological modelling studies – A case study of Australia

Multi-parameter approaches for improved ensemble prediction accuracy in hydrology and water quality modeling

Improved Medium- And Long-Term Runoff Forecasting Using A Multimodel Approach In The Yellow River Headwaters Region Based On Large-Scale And Local-Scale Climate Information

Application of Boruta algorithms as a robust methodology for performance evaluation of CMIP6 general circulation models for hydro-climatic studies

Hydrological Model Diversity Enhances Streamflow Forecast Skill at Short‐ to Medium‐Range Timescales

Integrated Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Models to Improve Flood Simulation Capability in the Data-Scarce Three Gorges Reservoir Region

Multi‐temporal Hydrological Residual Error Modeling for Seamless Subseasonal Streamflow Forecasting

Combination of Multiple Data-Driven Models for Long-Term Monthly Runoff Predictions Based on Bayesian Model Averaging

Benchmarking high-resolution hydrologic model performance of long-term retrospective streamflow simulations in the contiguous United States

Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations

Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins

Multi-Scenario Integration Comparison of CMADS and TMPA Datasets for Hydro-Climatic Simulation over Ganjiang River Basin, China

How Well Can Machine Learning Models Perform without Hydrologists? Application of Rational Feature Selection to Improve Hydrological Forecasting

Assessment of monthly runoff simulations based on a physics-informed machine learning framework: The effect of intermediate variables in its construction