Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
Mika Paavola,Kari Kanto,Jonas Ranstam,Antti Malmivaara,Jari Inkinen,Juha Kalske,Vesa Savolainen,Ilkka Sinisaari,Simo Taimela,Teppo L Järvinen,Jarkko Pajarinen,Sikri Tukiainen,Kalevi Hietaniemi,Vesa Lepola,Jyrki Salmenkivi,Mikko Salmela,Timo Järvelä,Janne Lehtinen,Ville Haapamäki,Heikki Kolehmainen,Mathias Bäck,Mikael Salmela,Tarja Kunnala,Sami Niskanen,Hanna-Mari Laiho,Leena Kangas-Viri,Leena Caravitis,Sanna Hokkanen,Sari Karesvuori,Soile Lindholm,Pirjo Toivonen,Eero Hölli,Lena Laine,Esa Läärä
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216
IF: 18.4793
2020-10-05
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Objectives To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison). Methods We conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35–65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry. Results In the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were −2.0 (95% CI −8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and −8.0 (−17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (−5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and −3.9 (−12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events. Conclusions ASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
sport sciences