Understanding AMOC stability: the North Atlantic Hosing Model Intercomparison Project
Laura C. Jackson,Eduardo Alastrué de Asenjo,Katinka Bellomo,Gokhan Danabasoglu,Helmuth Haak,Aixue Hu,Johann Jungclaus,Warren Lee,Virna L. Meccia,Oleg Saenko,Andrew Shao,Didier Swingedouw
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1975-2023
IF: 5.1
2023-04-06
Geoscientific Model Development
Abstract:Abstract. The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is an important part of our climate system. The AMOC is predicted to weaken under climate change; however, theories suggest that it may have a tipping point beyond which recovery is difficult, hence showing quasi-irreversibility (hysteresis). Although hysteresis has been seen in simple models, it has been difficult to demonstrate in comprehensive global climate models. Here, we outline a set of experiments designed to explore AMOC hysteresis and sensitivity to additional freshwater input as part of the North Atlantic Hosing Model Intercomparison Project (NAHosMIP). These experiments include adding additional freshwater (hosing) for a fixed length of time to examine the rate and mechanisms of AMOC weakening and whether the AMOC subsequently recovers once hosing stops. Initial results are shown from eight climate models participating in the Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The AMOC weakens in all models as a result of the freshening, but once the freshening ceases, the AMOC recovers in half of the models, and in the other half it stays in a weakened state. The difference in model behaviour cannot be explained by the ocean model resolution or type nor by details of subgrid-scale parameterisations. Likewise, it cannot be explained by previously proposed properties of the mean climate state such as the strength of the salinity advection feedback. Instead, the AMOC recovery is determined by the climate state reached when hosing stops, with those experiments where the AMOC is weakest not experiencing a recovery.
geosciences, multidisciplinary