The Effects of Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy on Salivary Pepsin Concentration in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Zhang Qing-Qing,Xie Meng,Guo Rui-Xin,Liu Xiao-Hong,Ma Si-Jing,Na Li,Chen Yang-Juan,Yang Min-Juan,Shi Ye-Wen,Ren Xiao-Yong,Luo Hua-Nan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07439-y
2022-01-01
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Abstract:To investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication therapy on salivary pepsin concentration in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients with HP infection. A total of 477 patients with suspected LPR were enrolled from June 2020 to September 2021. Reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, the positive rates and disintegrations per minute values of HP infection detected by 14C urea breath test and salivary pepsin concentrations analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared in LPR patients and non-LPR patients with or without HP infection. HP-positive patients were treated with HP eradication therapy while HP-negative patients with PPI therapy. The scores of nagging cough (0.88 vs. 0.50, P = 0.035), erythema or hyperemia (1.93 vs. 1.78, P = 0.035) and vocal fold edema (1.04 vs. 0.85, P = 0.025) were higher in the LPR (+) Hp (+) subgroup than in LPR (+) Hp (−) subgroup. The concentrations of salivary pepsin in the Hp (+) subgroup were higher than in the Hp (−) subgroup either in LPR patients (75.24 ng/ml vs. 61.39 ng/ml, P = 0.005) or the non-LPR patients (78.42 ng/ml vs. 48.96 ng/ml, P = 0.024). Compared to baseline (before treatment), scores of nagging cough (0.35 vs. 0.84, P = 0.019) and erythema or hyperemia (1.50 vs. 1.83, P = 0.039) and the concentrations of salivary pepsin (44.35 ng/ml vs. 74.15 ng/ml, P = 0.017) in LPR patients with HP infection decreased after HP treatment; yet, this was not observed for the LPR patients without HP infection treated with PPI only (P > 0.05). HP infection may aggravate the symptoms and signs of LPR patients, partly by increasing their salivary pepsin concentration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?