Association Between Ambient Air Pollutants and Birthweight of Singletons Following Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Xiaoming Jiang,Jiali Cai,Xinli Wang,Lanlan Liu,Jianzhi Ren,Renjie Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115454
IF: 7.129
2023-01-01
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the associations between exposure to ambient air pollutants and birthweight following ART treatment. Design: Retrospective cohort study.Methods: We included 11,599 singletons derived from fresh cycles or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles between Jan 2013 and Dec 2019. Exposure to six air pollutants (SO2, NO2, CO, O3, PM2.5, and PM10) at patients` residences and the clinic site were estimated using the inverse distance weighting interpolation method based on data obtained from monitor sites. The daily mean levels of pollutants were estimated in potential exposure windows (the period from three months before treatment to oocyte retrieval, the period of ovarian stimulation, the period of in vitro culture, the period from embryo transfer to hCG test, the period of entire pregnancy, the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester) were calculated. Generalized additive models adjusted for confounders including maternal age, BMI, and parity were used to evaluate the association between exposures and birthweight. Interaction of exposures and ART-associated factors, such as supraphysiologic estradiol and frozen-thawed, were explored in an XGboost model.Main outcome measures: Birthweight and z-score of singletons. Results: In fresh cycles, O3 exposure during the period from three months before treatment to oocyte retrieval and SO2 exposure during in vitro culture at the ART clinic showed a linear association with birthweight (7.24, 95% CI: 1.18-13.31 g per 10 mu g/m3 increase in O3; 25.92, 95% CI: 8.26-43.58 g per 10 mu g/m3 increase in SO2, respectively). For patients receiving single blastocyst transfer with exposures below the China standard of 20 mu g/ m3, an increase of 10 mu g/m3 in SO2 was associated with a 61.52 (95% CI: 1.13-121.91) g increase in birthweight. In FET cycles, no significant association was found between air pollution and birthweight. XGboost model did not reveal a strong interaction between the exposures and ART-related factors, except for the interactions between O3 exposure and BMI. However, none of the interactions reached a higher rank of importance.Conclusions: Air pollution exposure during ART treatment may affect the birthweight of the offspring.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?