Changes in Corneal Curvature and Aberrations after Cataract Surgery

Ye Dai,Xiaoting Ruan,Wei Wang,Xiaoyun Chen,Guangming Jin,Lanhua Wang,Xiaoxun Gu,Bo Qu,Jianping Liu,Xuhua Tan,Enen Zhang,Jun Fu,Lixia Luo,Zhenzhen Liu,Yizhi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/aes-22-4
2022-01-01
Annals of Eye Science
Abstract:Background: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal high-order aberrations (HOAs) are the two main causes of poor visual quality after cataract surgery. Changes in the parameters of corneal HOAs after cataract surgery and their effects on and relationships with changes in corneal curvature have not yet been reported. This study aimed to explore changes in anterior, posterior and total corneal curvature, astigmatism and HOAs after microincision cataract surgery. Methods: Sixty-one age-related cataract patients (61 eyes) were included in this prospective study. The total, anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism and corneal HOAs were analyzed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and iTrace before, one day, one week and three months after 2.2 mm temporal microincision coaxial phacoemulsification to evaluate the changes in anterior, posterior and total corneal curvature, astigmatism and corneal HOAs. Results: The mean J0 and J45 values of anterior, posterior and total corneal curvature obtained by ASOCT showed no statistically significant difference between preoperatively and any postoperative followup. SIA occurred on the anterior, posterior and total corneal surfaces and showed no statistically significant difference at any postoperative follow-up. No significant changes in 3rd-order oblique trefoil, vertical coma or 4th-order spherical aberrations were observed after surgery except for a significant increase in horizontal coma at postoperative day 1 (POD1). Conclusions: There were no significant changes in corneal curvature after 2.2 mm temporal microincision coaxial phacoemulsification, and the corneal HOAs were not changed significantly except for the increase in horizontal coma at POD1, which may be one of the main reasons of poor visual quality at POD1 in some cataract patients who have good uncorrected or corrected distance vision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?