Abstract:Urbanization represents a significant environmental change, and as urban land use continues to expand rapidly, understanding its impact on wildlife populations becomes critical for conservation management. However, the extent of these effects remains uncertain due to inconsistent evidence from studies focusing on single species, limited sites and short time frames. To address these gaps, we conducted a nationwide capture‐mark‐recapture study over an 8‐year period, examining the effects of urbanization on the survival and biometry of common bird species. Urbanization forms one of the most drastic alterations of the environment and poses a major threat to wildlife. The human–induced modifications of the landscape may affect individual's fitness resulting in population declines. Research on how urbanization affects fitness traits has shown mixed results. However, studies typically contrasted data from a single species from few urban and non‐urban sites collected over short timeframes. Examining multiple species across a broad urbanization gradient enables a more robust comparison and understanding of how different species are impacted by urbanization‐knowledge crucial for generating population predictions, which are essential for conservation management. Here, we use data from a nation‐wide citizen science project to examine variation in survival and relative body mass and size (wing length) of common passerine birds, collected along an urbanization gradient in the Netherlands over an 8‐year period. Urbanization was measured as the distance from the city's border and the proportion of impervious surface area. Although the overall association between urbanization and survival was slightly negative, there was support for lower survival closer to the city in three species (chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita, European robin Erithacus rubecula, European greenfinch Chloris chloris) and higher survival closer to the city in two (great tit Parus major and house sparrow Passer domesticus) of the 11 species examined. The contrasting survival successes among species suggest that ongoing urbanization may lead to shifts in community structure and loss of biodiversity. Impacts of urbanization on relative mass and size also exhibited varying effects, albeit less pronounced, and these effects were not correlated with the effects on survival. This implies that body mass and size cannot be used as indicators for urban‐associated patterns of survival. Our results further imply that effective conservation management targeting bird communities should involve a range of diverse actions, as focusing on single measures is unlikely to simultaneously impact multiple species due to the variation in responses to urbanization.

The response of bird populations to habitat loss

Population consequences of migratory variability differ between flyways

Habitat loss and thermal tolerances influence the sensitivity of resident bird populations to winter weather at regional scales

Population responses of bird populations to climate change on two continents vary with species’ ecological traits but not with direction of change in climate suitability

A life-history spectrum of population responses to simultaneous change in climate and land use

Loss of functional connectivity in migration networks induces population decline in migratory birds

Population trends are more strongly linked to environmental change and species traits in birds than mammals

Synergistic effects of climate and land‐use change influence broad‐scale avian population declines

Avian responses to extreme weather across functional traits and temporal scales

Which birds have the most to lose? an analysis of bird species' feeding habitat in changing Australian landscapes

Consistent response of bird populations to climate change on two continents

Effects of urbanization on bird migration

Fitness consequences of anthropogenic subsidies for a partially migratory wading bird

Integrating broad‐scale data to assess demographic and climatic contributions to population change in a declining songbird

Quantifying the impact of environmental changes on migratory species: a model perturbation framework

Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds

Landscape fragmentation affects responses of avian communities to climate change

Impacts on avian migratory patterns due to climate change and hormonal disruption: a review

Predicting population responses to environmental change: the importance of considering informed dispersal strategies in spatially structured population models

Long-distance migratory birds threatened by multiple independent risks from global change

A country‐wide examination of effects of urbanization on common birds