Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Runzhuo Ma,Zenan Liu,Yinchu Cheng,Pengxiang Zhou,Yuting Pan,Hai Bi,Liyuan Tao,Bin Yang,Haizhui Xia,Xuehua Zhu,Jide He,Wei He,Guoliang Wang,Yi Huang,Lulin Ma,Jian Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.001
IF: 3
2022-01-01
European Urology Open Science
Abstract:Context: The role of tumor size in predicting prognosis in upper tract urothelial Objective: To assess the prognostic value of tumor size in patients with UTUC through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify all relevant articles published up to December 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Available hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were analyzed to evaluate the association between tumor size and survival outcomes. Evidence synthesis: A total of 35 articles representing 32 292 patients met the eligibility criteria and were finally included for the meta-analysis. Tumor size was significantly associated with poor outcomes in terms of overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28-1.58), cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.47-1.88), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13-1.38), and intravesical recurrence (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.20). There was between-study heterogeneity in the effect of tumor size on all these meta-analyses, with p < 0.10 and I2 generally >50%. Subgroup analyses illustrated that the association of tumor size with adverse prognosis in UTUC patients is not affected by treatment modalities. Segmental resection of ureter, whether receiving lymph node dissection, cutoff of tumor size, and region of population were potential sources of heterogeneity. The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis of survival outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?