Connectome-based Individualized Prediction of Reciprocity Propensity and Sensitivity to Framing: a Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Huihua Fang,Chong Liao,Zhao Fu,Shuang Tian,Yuejia Luo,Pengfei Xu,Frank Krueger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac269
IF: 4.861
2022-01-01
Cerebral Cortex
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The social representation theory states that individual differences in reciprocity decisions are composed of a stable central core (i.e., reciprocity propensity, RP) and a contextual-dependent periphery (i.e., sensitivity to the framing effect; SFE, the effect by how the decision is presented). However, the neural underpinnings that explain RP and SFE are still unknown.METHOD:Here, we employed prediction and lesion models to decode resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of RP and SFE for reciprocity decisions of healthy volunteers who underwent RS functional magnetic resonance imaging and completed one-shot trust (give frame) and distrust (take frame) games as trustees.RESULTS:Regarding the central core, reciprocity rates were positively associated between the give and take frame. Neuroimaging results showed that inter-network RSFC between the default-mode network (DMN; associated with mentalizing) and cingulo-opercular network (associated with cognitive control) contributed to the prediction of reciprocity under both frames. Regarding the periphery, behavioral results demonstrated a significant framing effect-people reciprocated more in the give than in the take frame. Our neuroimaging results revealed that intra-network RSFC of DMN (associated with mentalizing) contributed dominantly to the prediction of SFE.CONCLUSION:Our findings provide evidence for distinct neural mechanisms of RP and SFE in reciprocity decisions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?