Abstract:Temporal grounding is the task of locating a specific segment from an untrimmed video according to a query sentence. This task has achieved significant momentum in the computer vision community as it enables activity grounding beyond pre-defined activity classes by utilizing the semantic diversity of natural language descriptions. The semantic diversity is rooted in the principle of compositionality in linguistics, where novel semantics can be systematically described by combining known words in novel ways (compositional generalization). However, existing temporal grounding datasets are not carefully designed to evaluate the compositional generalizability. To systematically benchmark the compositional generalizability of temporal grounding models, we introduce a new Compositional Temporal Grounding task and construct two new dataset splits, i.e., Charades-CG and ActivityNet-CG. We empirically find that they fail to generalize to queries with novel combinations of seen words. We argue that the inherent compositional structure (i.e., composition constituents and their relationships) inside the videos and language is the crucial factor to achieve compositional generalization. Based on this insight, we propose a variational cross-graph reasoning framework that explicitly decomposes video and language into hierarchical semantic graphs, respectively, and learns fine-grained semantic correspondence between the two graphs. Meanwhile, we introduce a novel adaptive structured semantics learning approach to derive the structure-informed and domain-generalizable graph representations, which facilitate the fine-grained semantic correspondence reasoning between the two graphs. To further evaluate the understanding of the compositional structure, we also introduce a more challenging setting, where one of the components in the novel composition is unseen. This requires more sophisticated understanding of the compositional structure to infer the potential semantics of the unseen word based on the other learned composition constituents appearing in both the video and language context, and their relationships. Extensive experiments validate the superior compositional generalizability of our approach, demonstrating its ability to handle queries with novel combinations of seen words as well as novel words in the testing composition.

Maintaining Reasoning Consistency in Compositional Visual Question Answering

Compositional Substitutivity of Visual Reasoning for Visual Question Answering

Overcoming Language Priors In Vqa Via Decomposed Linguistic Representations

In-Context Compositional Generalization for Large Vision-Language Models

C-VQA: A Compositional Split of the Visual Question Answering (VQA) v1.0 Dataset

Logical Implications for Visual Question Answering Consistency

ConMe: Rethinking Evaluation of Compositional Reasoning for Modern VLMs

Joint Answering and Explanation for Visual Commonsense Reasoning

Align and Aggregate: Compositional Reasoning with Video Alignment and Answer Aggregation for Video Question-Answering

Compositional Memory for Visual Question Answering

VQA-LOL: Visual Question Answering under the Lens of Logic

Convincing Rationales for Visual Question Answering Reasoning

From Shallow to Deep: Compositional Reasoning over Graphs for Visual Question Answering

Graph Reasoning Networks for Visual Question Answering

3D-Aware Visual Question Answering about Parts, Poses and Occlusions

VISREAS: Complex Visual Reasoning with Unanswerable Questions

Comprehensive Visual Question Answering on Point Clouds through Compositional Scene Manipulation

Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding

Linguistically Driven Graph Capsule Network for Visual Question Reasoning

Variational Cross-Graph Reasoning and Adaptive Structured Semantics Learning for Compositional Temporal Grounding

ComQA:Compositional Question Answering via Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks