Abstract:Parameters in climate models are usually calibrated manually, exploiting only small subsets of the available data. This precludes both optimal calibration and quantification of uncertainties. Traditional Bayesian calibration methods that allow uncertainty quantification are too expensive for climate models; they are also not robust in the presence of internal climate variability. For example, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically require model runs and are sensitive to internal variability noise, rendering them infeasible for climate models. Here we demonstrate an approach to model calibration and uncertainty quantification that requires only model runs and can accommodate internal climate variability. The approach consists of three stages: (a) a calibration stage uses variants of ensemble Kalman inversion to calibrate a model by minimizing mismatches between model and data statistics; (b) an emulation stage emulates the parameter‐to‐data map with Gaussian processes (GP), using the model runs in the calibration stage for training; (c) a sampling stage approximates the Bayesian posterior distributions by sampling the GP emulator with MCMC. We demonstrate the feasibility and computational efficiency of this calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES) approach in a perfect‐model setting. Using an idealized general circulation model, we estimate parameters in a simple convection scheme from synthetic data generated with the model. The CES approach generates probability distributions of the parameters that are good approximations of the Bayesian posteriors, at a fraction of the computational cost usually required to obtain them. Sampling from this approximate posterior allows the generation of climate predictions with quantified parametric uncertainties. Calibrating climate models with available data and quantifying their uncertainties are essential to make climate predictions accurate and actionable. A primary source of uncertainties in climate models comes from representation of small‐scale processes such as moist convection. Parameters in convection schemes and other parameterizations are usually calibrated by hand, using only a small fraction of data that are available. As a result, the calibration process may miss information about the small‐scale processes in question. This paper presents a proof‐of‐concept, in an idealized setting, of how parameters in climate models can be calibrated using a substantial fraction of the available data, and how uncertainties in the parameters can be quantified. We employ a new algorithm, called calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES), which makes such calibration and uncertainty quantification feasible for computationally expensive climate models. CES reduces the hundreds of thousands of model runs usually required to quantify uncertainties in computer models to hundreds, thereby achieving about a factor 1,000 speedup. It leads to more robust calibration and uncertainty quantification in the presence of noise arising from chaotic variability of the climate system. We show how uncertainties in climate model parameters can be translated into quantified uncertainties of climate predictions through ensemble integrations. We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution

Convergence of ensemble forecast distributions in weak and strong forcing convective weather regimes

Flow dependence of forecast uncertainty in a large convection‐permitting ensemble

Flow‐ and scale‐dependent spatial predictability of convective precipitation combining different model uncertainty representations

Ensemble forecasting: A foray of dynamics into the realm of statistics

How large does a large ensemble need to be?

On the Impact of the Choice of Global Ensemble in Forcing a Regional Ensemble System

Huge Ensembles Part I: Design of Ensemble Weather Forecasts using Spherical Fourier Neural Operators

Different Initial Condition Perturbation Methods for Convection-Permitting Ensemble Forecasting over South China during the Rainy Season

Quantifying uncertainty in climate projections with conformal ensembles

Estimating Uncertainty in Simulated ENSO Statistics

Impacts of initial condition perturbation blending in 10- and 40-member convection-allowing ensemble forecasts

Evaluating the Trade‐offs Between Ensemble Size and Ensemble Resolution in an Ensemble‐variational Data Assimilation System

A Foray of Dynamics into the Realm of Statistics: A Review of Ensemble Forecasting

Comparative study of Lorenz model based ensemble forecasting and single forecasting

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM

Changes to intrinsic weather forecast uncertainty in one scenario of extreme future climate

Mitigating against the between‐ensemble‐member precipitation bias in a lagged sub‐seasonal ensemble

The primacy of doubt: Evolution of numerical weather prediction from determinism to probability

New model ensemble reveals how forcing uncertainty and model structure alter climate simulated across CMIP generations of the Community Earth System Model

An Ensemble Constrained Variational Analysis of Atmospheric Forcing Data and Its Application to Evaluate Clouds in CAM5

Spatial Dispersion and Statistical Description of Organized Cumulus Cloud Ensembles in Radiative Convective Equilibrium